
Analysis: 'Treaty of Waitangi' Comic For High School Students Has Been Quietly Brainwashing Away Since 2018 (Part 35)
Above is another picture from the comic we have been analysing. Today we start on page 11.
HERE is the whole comic.
If you want to know why we are analysing this comic, just refer to blogs for the last few days.
You can read our analysis of previous sections of the comic by going to our web site and clicking on ‘blogs’.
In short, the comic was released into schools in 2018 to brainwash our children.
What is its purpose?
Maori Activists inside the Labour government, particularly the Maori caucus, supported by the Greens and Te Pati Maori, plus a hoard of woke bureaucrats are grooming our children so that when our children leave school and become old enough to vote, they will vote for the Maori activist cause.
In this way, so their plan goes, Maori will be able to legitimately and legally take over the country. That is to say, they are grooming our children to vote for the Maori activist cause. This comic is therefore propaganda.
What’s happening here is exactly what happened in other regimes in the 1920s and 30s, preparing the ground for dictatorship. In the case of New Zealand, it’s preparing the country for tribal rule.
Hitler had his Hitler Youth.
Now we have the “Maori Youth” mirroring them, as evidenced by the actions of Female Hurricanes, the students of a Palmerston North School, and the Maori who tried to stop the fishing contest in Northland. Here is another example – click HERE and click HERE
So what is there to say about this picture on page 11?
—————————–
On page 11, the comic steps up the brainwashing / propaganda.
It says, “As punishment for “rebelling” against the government, the British took millions of hectares of land from some iwi.’
What are we to make of this?
First, the word “rebelling” is in inverted commas, which makes it a snide remark. It’s contemptuous. It’s scoffing. The authors of the comic don’t believe Maori were rebelling, but they were. Plain and simple, this is what they were doing.
The rebellious chiefs of the time spoke of rebellion, of a separate and sovereign monarch, of a separate state, of division of the nation. This was treason and the British put down the rebellions. The Maori chiefs who were rebelling were warned that if they continued with what they were doing, the British would send in troops, which they did.
What about the confiscations of land? These were to pay for the cost of putting down the rebellions. New Zealand was an infant colony, struggling financially. Keeping law and order cost. That the British made the rebels pay for the cost of their rebellion was entirely fair.
These rebel chiefs were breaching the Treaty. They had signed up to come under the sovereign rule of the British via the Treaty. This meant being loyal to the government, not competing with it for control of the country.
What’s missing from this comic, glaringly, is any mention of the Kohimarama Conference in 1860 where 112 chiefs met for a month. Many of these same chiefs had signed the Treaty at Waitangi, 20 years earlier.
At the end of the conference they moved and passed a series of resolutions. They were unanimous that they ceded sovereignty to the Queen at Waitangi in 1840. They also pledged to do nothing to breach the Treaty. That is to say, they pledged not to do what the rebel chiefs were doing.
Read carefully the resolution from the conference below.

What this conference tells us is that there were many chiefs who were honouring the Treaty, working with the government.
The comic wants to give the impression that all the chiefs were rebelling. This is far from the truth. The truth is that it was only a tiny fraction of chiefs. The rest were ‘with’ the British, and on their side.
Dr John Robinson makes a good point about the Maori King in New Zealand today. “In his keynote speech to mark the tenth anniversary of his ascension, the Maori King spoke of Maori exercising dual sovereignty over Aotearoa-New Zealand by 2025. This is less constitutional monarchy than it is constitutional revolution. This is met with bland acceptance and Government support for the movement, with a complete absence of awareness of past history and the implications for the future. The meetings with flag and ceremony that seemed theatre in the nineteenth century were followed by threats and military action by the rebels to support their claims for separate territory, and open rebellion. The current seemingly absurd call for separation of New Zealand into two monarchies may prove to be more than symbolic if kingites once again take armed action.” (John Robinson. The Kingite Rebellion. Tross Publishing. 2016.Page 365)
It’s obvious. The authors of this comic are radicalising our young people, sowing in them the seeds of rebellion too.
————————-
This comic is a key component of Maori activists to take over the country. It targets children.
If you are not convinced that Tribalists / Maori Activists and their woke fellow travellers are trying to take over the country, click HERE
In my book TAKEOVER: 18 STRATEGIES MAORI ACTIVISTS ARE USING TO TAKE OVER NEW ZEALAND I detail all the strategies activists are using.
You can read this book HERE.
In tomorrow’s blog, I will continue the analysis.
See you then!
—————-
As I have said, we must get behind Winston, Jones, Seymour and Luxon, emailing them regularly with encouragement and our full support to expunge co-governance and Maorification from New Zealand.
Leaders need encouragement constantly.
Email Luxon urging him to do what the people of New Zealand elected him to do, which was to rid the country of Maorification and co-governance.
Warn him that he will be a one term PM if he doesn’t.
Here are their email addresses:
Shane.Jones@parliament.govt.nz
Winston.Peters@parliament.govt.nz
David.Seymour@parliament.govt.nz
Christopher.luxon@parliament.govt.nz
Erica.Stanford@parliament.govt.nz.

In 1863, the New Zealand Settlements Act 1863 was enacted. This Act provided for the confiscation, by the Crown, of lands of Maori whom the Crown assessed to have been in “rebellion” against the authority of the Queen.
As part of Ngati Tama Claims Settlement Act 2003, the Crown acknowledges that—
(a) the confiscations were indiscriminate in extent and application and had a devastating effect on the welfare, economy, and development of Ngati Tama:
(b) the division of the ancestral land of Ngati Tama by the arbitrary placement of the northern confiscation boundary has resulted in iwi rights in these areas being assessed under 2 different systems:
(c) the prejudicial effects of the confiscations were compounded by the inadequacies in the Compensation Court process that included long delays in the promised return of land to Ngati Tama individuals:
(d) the confiscations of 1865 deprived Ngati Tama of access to their traditional sources of food and other resources associated with that confiscated land:
(e) the confiscations were wrongful and in breach of the Treaty of Waitangi and the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi.
The 2003 Judgements were from the Waitangi Tribunal which is corrupt. What more do you expect?