Yesterday I read an excellent piece on the web site the BFD. He is writing about 5 Waters.
The author uses the word ‘coup’ quite rightly. But what he misses, in my estimation, is clarity about the big picture.
The big picture is that radical Maori are well on the road to taking over New Zealand. This is their clear intention. This is what they are gunning for.
Anyone who says otherwise must be walking around with their eyes closed, or living in denial. It’s just so obvious.
We must get this message to the general population of New Zealand – the message that elite Maori are attempting to take over the country, and it’s happening real time.
I want to share the BFD piece with you here
If “We the people” don’t stop this and then resurrect the one and only Founding Document, namely the Royal Charter, so it can never happen again, then these “thieving few” will not only succeed but will then privatize and sell to a Corporatocracy. Think Blackrock.
Ian, it’s great to see someone understands the Treaty is being used as a con to rip off the majority. It had nothing to do with law and order in New Zealand under one flag. This was achieved when Queen Victoria issued her Royal Charter on the 16 November 1840 after the Treaty had achieved its purpose and made Maori British Subjects with the same rights as the people of England. Until we forget the Treaty and use the Royal Charter as our true Founding Document and first Constitution, Maori will continue to use the Treaty to take over New Zealand as they did in the 14 century from the tangata whenua,
And we must be absolutely clear it’s not “the Maoris” as so many would say, but a tribal elite, the iwi class, the rangatira aristocracy, or “radical Maori” as you put it.
Agreed. But are the non Maori aristocracy doing about it??? Why are they not rising up and creating push back again the tribal elite? So far, just dead silence. My thinking is that they don’t want to be bullied and harassed by the elite Maori. This is why Maori have never got out of their rut…their culture keeps them down.
so over it, why hasn’t the true history of New Zealand has never been let out.
when the word Tangata Whenua means “the ancient ones” or “the people before us’ .
they were the people that Maori saw before their arrival to NZ.
Aotearoa was never the name for New Zealand, and it does not belong to Maori.
We are stuffed. There is no real opposition and even if National get in we will be stuffed they are not all that different and the leader is not all that smart.
The idiot who I wish would find a village and move there, preferably in England said on TV this morning in response to ” How about the hard workers who cannot work longer than 65 ”
Said idiot replied ” Oh they could upskill to project management or something like that ” Now can anyone tell when they ever heard of a hard-working labourer going straight from the shovel to project management? Such a stupid comment coming from a party leader says very little for the party. That man should resign.
Re: the idiot. Are you talking about Luxon?
Alastair is 100% correct with his assessment of Teflon Luxon, an absolute Egg Head. He was the one who Maorized Air NEW ZEALAND and he has already shown his colours in saying he supports Co-Governance. There are some astute MP’s in National but Teflon Luxon is not one of them. This Teflon Egg Head appears to be as thick as two planks, and would be better suited to join Cindy’s tribal mob of mongrels. Thank goodness we have the blog site named STOP CO – GOVERNANCE to counter the lies and deceit of the pusillanimous buffoons.who want to destroy the fabric of NEW ZEALAND society and create tribal rule.
When Palmer, Lange and the Governor General, Rev Sir Paul Reeves had their disagreement over the Treaty on the ABC’s Programme Four Corners in 1990, this was an interesting statement by former Labour Minister, Hon. Matiu Rata, “When Mori people’s faith in the rule of law was destroyed, it introduced such thoughts as civil war”. Hmm!
For a copy of this debate by Palmer, Lange and Reeves. Contact ONZF@bigpond.com.au
Excellent,
the signs are everywhere.i urge everyone to sound the alarm & act now to stop this rapidlygrowing cancer
Hi What I can’t understand is that this 3rd reading of the Three Waters Bill in Parliament how is it possible that this government can bring in an entirely new concept (to make it into Five Waters) at this late stage? Surely, to keep things legal this extra concept should have been included at the 1st reading stage? How is this procedure possible? Not to mention it all being such a rushed job. In a court of law all disclosures must be made at the outset, with no surprises later on. Shame the electorate can’t have the same clarity.
Reading your article helped me a lot and I agree with you. But I still have some doubts, can you clarify for me? I’ll keep an eye out for your answers.