Elite Maori try hard to make the rest of New Zealand feel guilty about a lot of things – that we are breaking the Treaty, that we ripped Maori off in history, that colonialism was a disaster for Maori, that New Zealand was paradise for Maori before Europeans arrived, that as white people we need to feel ashamed, and so on.
Why are they weaponizing guilt in this way?
That’s easy. If elite Maori can make the population feel guilty, we will lie down and just let the coup rumble on. We won’t put up any opposition. Guilt does that – it disempowers people. Really, Kiwis are. being abused.
In today’s blog, Dr John Robinson neutralizes the guilt trip being laid upon us by elite Maori and he explains how best to respond.
The ‘Guilt Trip’ is Gaslighting, and they know it.
While I agree with John’s history above, he once again overlooks the Treaty was only an agreement between Maori and the Crown when New Zealand was under the depemdency of New South Wales. At this time New Zealand was under the laws of New South Wales that gave no rights to Maori, therefore, New Zealand had to separate from New South Wales and become a British Colony in its own right with a Governor and Constitution to set up its own political, legal and justice systems under one flag and one law, irrespective of race, colour or creed.
This was achieved by a Royal Charter issued by Queen Victoria dated 16 November 1840 and enacted on 3 May 1841. For further details, check out our website.
There is no other document in our history that cames anywhere near to a Founding Document and first Contitution than Queen Victoria’s Royal Charter dated 16 November 1840. Use it or lose it, the choice is yours. .
The Royal Charter/Letters Patent dated 30th July 1839 issued by “Victoria by the Grace of God” under “The Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland”, extended the boundaries and Law’s of New South Wales over all the Islands of New Zealand. (Ref ONZF)
William Hobson was also appointed Our Lieutenant Governor in that same decree.
So from 30th July 1839 to 3rd May 1841, New Zealand was under the jurisdiction of New South Wales (Dependency). NSW had a very different outlook on the treatment of their indigenous people at that time.
Do you think we would have had a 1975 Treaty of Waitangi Act if our 1840 Royal Charter had been in place?
Why are the powers “that ought not be” hiding, suppressing and ignoring this document, hoping it will fade away into obscurity, why at the same time holding up a fake Treaty as our founding document?
It is obvious why the death penalty was abolished for treason after the Waitangi Tribunal was formed. (Ref ONZF’S Queen Victoria’s Royal Charter, our true Founding Document and First Constitution).
We do not want to lose it, we should understand it and use it.
Another great supporting article from STOP CO-GOVERNANCE.
The truth is the ink hadn’t dried on the treaty document and some maori tribes were tantamount to saying fuck the treaty and continued to murder and pillage. These tribes probably never had any intention of honoring this treaty and it is fair to say because of their primitive understanding and no concept of the treaty’s objectives and they transgressed the law. The then authorities with ever right as a punitive measure took these tribes lands, then years later some ignorant maori claimed their land had been stolen from them by the Crown. And then stupid inept politicians gave them monies which reinforced their thinking that you can break laws and agreements and the stupid politicians reward you. Now NEW ZEALANDERS are paying the price for poor governance. There is an old adage which states No good deed goes unpunished
Exactly Raleigh, but stupid and inept is being to kind.
I wonder why they never came across Sir Apirana Ngata’s book The Treaty of Waitangi- An Explanation where he stated: “The chiefs placed in the hands of the Queen of England, the Sovereignty and authority to make laws. Some sections of the Maori people violated that authority, war arose and blood was spilled. The law came into operation and the land was taken in payment. It was their chiefs who ceded that right to the Queen. The confiscations cannot therefore be objected to in the light of the Treaty.
If the confiscations cannot therefore be objected to in the light of Te Tiriti o Waitangi, as stated by Sir Apirana Ngata, why then did our politicians in 1975, create the Treaty of Waitangi Act and Waitangi Tribunal?
Did they not know about the Minister of Native affairs back in 1922, or if they did, did they not believe him?
Brilliant comment Neil, At least you understand our true history and not afraid to publish it. If only the others would do a little more research, they would also understand why the Royal Charter is so important, if we are to regain our Democracy.
There’s plenty to feel guilty about.
In particular taking the easy road by encouraging and sustaining the existence of iwi cult groups by means of treaty settlements and tax exemptions, from which otherwise those of Maori ancestry would have fully integrated by now into the general population, with better outcomes for all whilst avoiding an increasingly pressing problem.
In other words, we ought to feel guilty about giving in too easily to radical Maori demands. And by giving in, we have created a monster. Instead of assimilating, which is what would have happened if we had not given in, Maori are separating, and going back into their roots and ancestry, and superstitions, and mumbo jumbo etc – all downhill. They are also more demanding, more dependent, more militant. It’s a disaster. So yes, you are quite right Ron, we do have things to feel guilty about. Well said my friend.
Tһere’s ⅽertainly a lot to know about this subject. I love
all of the points you have maɗе.