What The Public Don't know......And The Media Are Hiding....
Our beaches are about to be given to Maori. Read more HERE
Former Waitangi Tribunal Member, Michael Bassett, Tells The Truth About The Tribunal
Helpfully, and accurately, Michael Bassett, who was a former member of the Waitangi Tribunal for 10 years, has just written about the Waitangi Tribunal.
You can read Michael’s excellent piece HERE
But I don’t think he goes far enough.
What’s missing? What’s missing is a discussion about the power of veto.
What I am talking about is much more than setting up “a parallel government”.
Rather, it’s about tribal leaders taking control of the country.How so ? Through something called ‘the power of veto’.
The Cambridge dictionary defines “veto” in this way: “an official power or right to refuse to accept or allow something.”
So when tribal representatives have power of veto, they get the final say as to what goes in NZ, and what doesn’t go, what laws are made and not made. You won’t hear about this in the media. Most media have been silenced as a result of the government’s $105 Public Interest Journalism Fund. All government administered web sites which deal with ‘history’ have been ‘doctored’ and therefore can’t be trusted. This is particularly harmful to students of all ages who rely on Google searches to fulfil academic requirements. Instead of finding truth, they are unwittingly brainwashed.
Essentially, co-governance is code for a coup by stealth.This coup is not something that is going to happen in the future.
It’s happening now in 2024, being progressed by stealth by Luxon.
Then in 2010 A Plan Was Launched By Tribal representatives To Change The Constitution of New Zealand Which Would Allow Tribal Leaders To Legally Take Over The Country.
This initiative, “Matike Mai Aotearoa, An Independent Working Group on Constitutional Transformation,” was first promoted at a meeting of the Iwi Chairs’ Forum in 2010.Between 2010 and 2024, this group has made chilling progress with its plan.
Dr John Robinson summarises their progress “The proposal [of Matike Mai Aotearoa] gives the iwi leadership around three-quarters of the power [to rule the entire country] together with a veto in the joint sphere [i.e the other quarter].Everyone else will be disenfranchised.This is a blueprint for the complete rule of New Zealand by a determined minority.” [1]
The point I want you to grasp is that tribal representatives plan to completely control the country are well under way and are on-going.
Dr John Robinson, arguably New Zealand’s foremost historian/researcher, and author of many widely acclaimed books, reveals the final piece of the jigsaw when he says “Many of the activists and iwi leaders intend a totally dual government system with separate Maori and non-Maori houses of parliament, and a Maori veto on all legislation.” [2] This the second and crucial piece of the jigsaw.
“A Maori veto on all legislation” means tribal leaders have the final say on everything that goes on in New Zealand, on what laws and legislation are passed and accepted in both houses of parliament.
Dr Robinson goes on to say, “The words [in the He PuaPua report] insist that power, “full authority”, must go to Maori.”
What does this mean?
It means a return to tribal rule, with tribal representatives completely running / controlling the country by 2040.
It means the absolute end to equality and democracy, and the installation, full blown, of apartheid.
[1] Dr John Robinson. He Puapua; Blueprint for breaking up New Zealand. 2022. Tross Publishing p76
[2] Dr John Robinson. He Puapua; Blueprint for breaking up New Zealand. 2022. Tross Publishing p12
———————-
As I have said, we must get behind Winston, Jones, Seymour and Luxon, emailing them regularly with encouragement and our full support to expunge co-governance and Maorification from New Zealand.
Leaders need encouragement constantly.
Email Luxon urging him to do what the people of New Zealand elected him to do, which was to rid the country of Maorification and co-governance.
Warn him that he will be a one term PM if he doesn’t.
Here are their email addresses:
Shane.Jones@parliament.govt.nz
Winston.Peters@parliament.govt.nz
David.Seymour@parliament.govt.nz
Christopher.luxon@parliament.govt.nz
Hon. David Seymour: David.Seymour@parliament.govt.nz
Brooke Van Velden: Brooke.Vanvelden@parliament.govt.nz
Copy of an article published in the New Zealand Herald, Wednesday 17 November 1999.
A14 N Z Herald Wednesday, November 17, 1999.
Judge queries ethics of treaty demands
Researchers ‘pressured to change findings’
WELLINGTON – Some Treaty of Waitangi claimants have asked researchers to change findings that would be unhelpful to their cases says the chairman of the Waitangi Tribunal.
Justice Durie said also that some tribes had even tried to make the payments of researchers conditional on findings being altered. He said the issue – and several others – had raised questions about the need for a code of ethics for researchers claims lodged under the Treaty.
The comments were in a paper, Ethics and Values, released on the Indigenous People and Law website.
Justice Durie said some groups had required commissioned researchers to remove material unhelpful to the claimant’s cases or amend their conclusions. Sometimes this was a condition of the researchers being paid. Some also presented biased claims, omitting evidence against their argument that should be presented. “There are also complaints from researchers of instructions not to consult with certain persons, or only those approved by the claimant groups,” said Justice Durie.
While codes of Ethics had caused problems with indigenous claims overseas, he believed they were a good idea.
Tribunal Director, Morrie Love believed the problem raised had occurred with contracted researchers.
The Tribunal had had problems with some claimant’s reports but this was now rare.
It now had a wide historical overview of issues covered by the claims around the country and was able to pick up any of the discrepancies quickly. Claimants could obviously say what the wanted. “At the end of the day, a claimants claim is a claimants claim”.
But claims were heavily scrutinized. Once submitted, the Crown case was also put followed by an independent tribunal report.
A code of ethics was probably a good idea, but ultimately it was up to researchers to fulfil their ethical responsibilities.
Justice Durie said other issues which, could be covered by a code were:
• A view by some claimants that kaumatua opinions and recollections should not be challenged or cross-examined.
• Whether all evidence presented to the tribunal should be publicly available.
“The Tribunal is able to restrict the publication and availability of material, but blanket restrictions give the appearance of secrecy and undermine public confidence in the process”.
Final statements as a result of the claim process so far (1999) total more than $530 million
NZPA
Supplied by the One New Zealand Foundation Inc. http://www.onenzfoundation.co.nz.