I predicted the red Queen would go at the end of last year, when the stories from the media were around of who or how labour would get on when she went.
I believe her demise was cherographed by the certain members of the labour party/MPs.
I reacon they are only reshufferling the seats on the challenger before it blew up.
When you think about it the Labour Government which has 65 seats, is only run by about 7 elected Labour MPs.
They dont seem to want to let anyone else in their govnerment do or run anything (communististic)
There we have it. The country stands on the abyss of a Marxist inspired racially divided future and four more years of this government will be all it takes to realise that dream. Indeed, it is worse than Marx could have engineered.
Jacinda’s lot have married Marxist principles to a social blueprint which accords privileges and status to Maori interests not available to the other eighty five percent of the population thereby fracturing what were our hitherto harmonious race relations. This is the bitter harvest which the incoming government will be required to jettison. Let’s pray they are up to the task.
Ref – Anthony Willy ( Link below to his full Karl Marks article)
One New Zealand Foundation Inc
on January 24, 2023 at 8:04 pm
I have just read an article stating, “Today at Ratana (during the annual parade of politicians there), Hon Christopher Luxon told those assembled there, including the media, that National opposes Co-governance for public services and spelt out why”.
“National opposes Co-Governance………….I want to explain in the context of where we are coming from because it does not mean Maori involved in decision making and partnering with Maori, we believe empowering by community, iwi ,Maori organisations, locally devolving, that is the way in which we can achieve it”.
Sure, sounds like Co-Governance to me. Still them and us!
I watched this carefully….he is more ‘for’ co-governance than I thought! Sheesh…I couldn’t see how ANYONE could interpret what he said as being anti governance…..he is pro co-governance, absolutely no doubt about it. He is hedging.
I predicted the red Queen would go at the end of last year, when the stories from the media were around of who or how labour would get on when she went.
I believe her demise was cherographed by the certain members of the labour party/MPs.
I reacon they are only reshufferling the seats on the challenger before it blew up.
When you think about it the Labour Government which has 65 seats, is only run by about 7 elected Labour MPs.
They dont seem to want to let anyone else in their govnerment do or run anything (communististic)
There we have it. The country stands on the abyss of a Marxist inspired racially divided future and four more years of this government will be all it takes to realise that dream. Indeed, it is worse than Marx could have engineered.
Jacinda’s lot have married Marxist principles to a social blueprint which accords privileges and status to Maori interests not available to the other eighty five percent of the population thereby fracturing what were our hitherto harmonious race relations. This is the bitter harvest which the incoming government will be required to jettison. Let’s pray they are up to the task.
Ref – Anthony Willy ( Link below to his full Karl Marks article)
https://www.nzcpr.com/karls-marks/
I have just read an article stating, “Today at Ratana (during the annual parade of politicians there), Hon Christopher Luxon told those assembled there, including the media, that National opposes Co-governance for public services and spelt out why”.
“National opposes Co-Governance………….I want to explain in the context of where we are coming from because it does not mean Maori involved in decision making and partnering with Maori, we believe empowering by community, iwi ,Maori organisations, locally devolving, that is the way in which we can achieve it”.
Sure, sounds like Co-Governance to me. Still them and us!
I watched this carefully….he is more ‘for’ co-governance than I thought! Sheesh…I couldn’t see how ANYONE could interpret what he said as being anti governance…..he is pro co-governance, absolutely no doubt about it. He is hedging.