Click on THIS link to try the test.

What's the point? Radical Maori have gotten away with fraud and corruption all because Kiwis don't know the Treaty.

That is to say, they were not able to say 'No!' to many of the interpretations and ideas dished out in front of them  because they did not know truth of the matter.

Now, at last, you can know the truth and push back.

Do the test over and over until you become an expert - someone who can argue and debate the issue intelligently from a place of facts and truth.

Remember, in the end, truth always wins, but you need to know the truth to be in the right position to win.

Stop Co-Governance is deadly serious about protecting democracy, free speech, one person one vote, all votes of equal value, and equal opportunities.

We think it’s worth fighting to stop racism and apartheid, Treaty of Waitangi fraud and corruption, and attempts by elite Maori to take over our country by stealth, trickery, and deceit.

Defending the one and attacking the other successfully requires skillful and relentless communication – booklets, flyers, blogs, emails, phone calls, marches, placards, banners, seminars, and….wait for it…billboards!

Billboards are an incredibly effective way to raise awareness and keep the issue top of mind. All political parties know this. Just look around the streets prior to an election.

Billboards cement a message for motorists, as they see them day after day, travelling to and from work.

The fact is, if we want to stop co-governance, we won’t do it without billboards. They are an incredible tool.

Below are just some of the designs we have come up with. You will think of others, and we welcome this. 

If you like to help by putting a billboard on your property, or your fence, and you want to know how to do it, click HERE

You can view more design ideas HERE and HERE and HERE

Already, Maori think they are in control of the country.

When they say “You must first get permission from Maori to have a referendum” this is tribal rule.

In the minds of radical Maori like Kelvin Davis, they are already in control. They think they rule the roost.

Their cockiness is on the increase, along with their arrogance.

What they want is to be in control, and everyone else to be their slave. Which is? Back to pre-1840.

Below is the piece that was published yesterday.
———————

Et tu Kelvin Davis, ‘ “I think the first thing that David Seymour needs to go do is go out to the people and ask for their permission,” he said. “He needs to get validation from Māori in the first place.”

Today, 8th November, 2023
03:19 pm
Bridie Witton

Willie Jackson: ‘People will go to war … against Seymour and his mates’
Labour Māori caucus co-chair Willie Jackson is suggesting there could be civil unrest if David Seymour’s hopes for a referendum on the Treaty of Waitangi are successful in the ACT Party leader’s coalition discussions with the National Party.

He warned people are so strongly opposed that they would “go to war” to stop it.

Jackson was speaking in Upper Hutt after the Labour caucus of 34 MPs undertook a secret ballot and confirmed Chris Hipkins as their leader, despite the party’s historic election loss.

Jackson said he would spend the next six months deciding whether he wanted to stay on as an MP. However, he would definitely stay on if such a referendum went ahead.

“If there’s one, if that happens, then it’s going to require me to stay around,” he said.

“I don’t want civil unrest in our country. I’m just giving a warning. I work amongst our people. I’m amongst people who will go to war for this against Seymour and his mates. Now Mr Luxon can get all disappointed with me. I’m just giving you a warning from the people who are saying to me, ‘they’d better not go through [with it].'”

Kelvin Davis, who has stood down as Labour Party deputy leader after the meeting, said he would evaluate whether he also wanted to stay in politics over the summer period.

“We’ve got still got the largest Māori caucus and in Parliament and you know, with Willie and I, we know that we need to continue to build and help the party to become a strong opposition,” he said.

He also raised concerns about a referendum on the Treaty of Waitangi, and said Seymour had not asked advice.

“I think the first thing that David Seymour needs to go do is go out to the people and ask for their permission,” he said. “He needs to get validation from Māori in the first place.”

What is this?  Simple. It’s arrogance.

First, read THIS article from today’s Otago Daily Times

The logic of Maori leaders like Willie Jackson is mind boggling.

WILLIE JACKSON: “What gives them the right to unilaterally tutū with the Treaty, when there are two partners … two groups that signed it, and yet one group is making a unilateral decision?”

STOP CO-GOVERNANCE: But wait a minute. The original Treaty in Maori, as signed at Waitangi on the 6th of February 1840 is a beautiful document. But between 1975 and now it’s been so contorted and twisted by Maori radicals, activists judges, lawyers, MPs and others that it’s now not recognisable compared to the original. It’s been completely and utterly fraudulently manipulated.

So, no, Mr Jackson. It’s Maori like you have been tutuing with the Treaty. This is why Mr Seymour is calling for a referendum. He wants to expose all the fraud and corruption.

OTAGO DAILY TIMES: Jackson said he was hearing from some they were ready to “go to war” over the matter.

STOP CO-GOVERNANCE: I can guarantee Maori are not saying this. It’s purely Willie Jackson and his cabal trying to frighten the New Zealand public, and particularly the PM Luxon.

They want him to cave in.

WILLIE JACKSON: “Be very clear, I don’t want any disruption or violence. I’m not advocating for that at all. But I do understand our people’s frustration and anger if this was to go ahead … I’m saying to you what Māori have been saying to me … they’re saying ‘This is not going to happen, we will do anything that has to be done to stop that referendum’.

“I’m just giving a warning: I work amongst our people … who will go to war for this, war against [ACT leader David] Seymour and his mates.”

OTAGO DAILY TIMES: He said people like Sir Graham Latimer and Sir Tipene O’Regan had been just two examples of people who mortgaged their homes to seek a resolution to Treaty breaches through the courts

STOP CO-GOVERNANCE: Sir Tipene O’Regan is now one of the wealthiest men in Canterbury. Basically, he invested in the Treaty Industry and it paid big dividends for him. Jackson makes it sound like O’Regan made a great sacrifice on behalf of Maori. It was not like this at all. For Sir Tipene is was a business venture”

Radical Maori always play the sympathy card to try and win the public to their cause. 

WILLIE JACKSON: “They won through that through the English system. This is such an affront – if that referendum comes forward, I would imagine to be hell to play (sic) if it goes through.”

STOP CO-GOVERNANCE: This is code for “We Maori infiltrated parliament, the Waitangi Tribunal, the courts, schools, universities – focussing on the Treaty – and we worked hard to corrupt the lot so that we could plunder New Zealand by going on a tribal raid. And it’s worked.”

Enough is enough.  Let’s fight hard to stop this nonsense.  What nonsense? All this lying and twisting of the truth, fooling the public of New Zealand.   

This tells you why THIS

Hugh, one of supporters, comments on this
—————–
These Maori radicals / activists like Jackson , Packer , Davidson , Tamihere and the Tribal-elite know that if these things ‘go to a vote’
in a referendum , THEY WILL LOSE .

Hence the thinly disguised threats and attempted intimidation and not too subtle incitements to violence .

The Tribal-elite are very anxious to regain the “ authority “ and “power” their ancestors enjoyed (only at tribal level mind you) prior to the ToW , which their ancestors requested because of the near genocidal inter-tribal war / murder / slaughter they were continually involved in , associated with enslavement , rape , infanticide and cannibalism .

Is this what Jackson , Packer, Davidson and Tamihere are threatening us with and inciting —- a return to “ the good old days” ?
Don’t be sucked in by this , Government. It is aimed at intimidating YOU.

They KNOW they cannot get their way under a Democratic vote , hence the threats and incitement.

DON’T BE SUCKED IN AND INTIMIDATED BY THIS BULLYING WHICH IS CLEARLY AIMED AT YOU !!

Stand up and be counted FOR US — who you represent.

Hugh

This tells you why THIS

Read THIS

Be sure to read the comments

Start by reading THIS

First it was Tau Henare threatening revenge on Auckland councillors who voted against Maori wards.

Then it was John Tamihere who threatened violence and city wide shutdowns if David Seymour touched the Treaty.

Now it’s Te Pati Maori threatening a hikoi of all hikois (protests).

John Key caved in when such threats were made when he was prime minister.

Maori have learned from this. Learned what? They have learnt that MP’s are, generally speaking, cowardly.

So what do Maori do? They play on this.

They threaten, bully, and intimidate. Lesson? John Key’s cave in actually fuelled bad Maori behaviour.

As I said, radical Maori have worked out that most MP’s don’t like conflict, and will avoid it at all costs.  

Most MPs, rather than accept conflict is inevitable if you are fighting for a better world, opt out of conflict, and try and appease.

It’s a great mistake to do this.  A disaster in fact.

In WW2, to stop the advance of evil, Churchill declared war on Germany.

He was a brave courageous leader.

The fact of the matter is that there is evil in this world, and there are bad people and good people.

Anyone who denies this is delusional.

If you want to side with the good people against the bad, you have to take sides.

And if you take sides, there will be conflict, because bad people like Hitler, must be opposed.

And opposition means conflict.  Why? Because you can’t reason with bad people.  All they know is bullying, intimidation, manipulation, and threats.

Co-governance is wrong.  It’s based on fraud and corruption.  It destroys democracy and equality.

It’s a bad thing being pushed by bad people, and therefore must be opposed.

So, sadly, conflict is inevitable.

Luxon, are you listening?

By the way, the media have a lot to answer for.

They too are bad.  How so?

They report co-governance as being a wonderful thing, (i.e. For the media good is bad, and bad is good, and they report it like that) just like they report Hamas as being wonderful.

Only a corrupt / bad / evil media would do that.

We have work to do. 

So what’s the take away? 

Conflict is good when you are fighting for what is good, as Churchill showed us.

In fact, it’s inevitable because bad people (like Hitler) won’t stop their advance by good people (like Churchill) being “nice” to them.

That’s called being gullible, naïve, and foolish.  

If radical Maori declare war on New Zealand, which is what they are doing, then we must, like brave soldiers, rise up and meet that challenge.

With what?  With truth, and whatever else it takes. 

For the sake of our children and grandchildren, this is a conflict we cannot and must not lose.

Start by reading THIS

After yesterday’s election recount result, Marama Davidson has come out swinging.

She calls Julian Batchelor’s message to New Zealand ‘rubbish’ but as to be expected, no examples given, and no detail provided.

For Marama, it’s rubbish for no other reason than Marama says it is.

She claims Julian Batchelor is creating division.

But is this true?

No, it’s not true. Julian is fighting for all New Zealanders against apartheid, racism, and separatism.

He’s fighting for all New Zealanders to preserve democracy which is one person one vote and all votes of equal value.

He’s fighting for all New Zealanders to stop one racial group being favoured over another.

Hitler wanted to favour one racial group against another, and look what happened.

The Maori Party, the Greens, and The Labour Party want to favour one racial group over all others, just like Hitler.

Who is that group? Maori.

Why is the media not exposing this? Why are they not picking up on this? Why are they not calling it out for what it truly is?

Answer? The $55m Public Interested Journalism fund which is still bubbling away.

So, no, Julian Batchelor is not creating division.

It’s the Maori Party, The Greens, and the Labour Party who are creating the division.

And Luxon, Seymour, and Peters better stop it by going to the root cause.

You can read the root cause HERE

 Start by reading THIS

This latest piece by Anne Salmond is serious tripe.

How so?

Anne says “Much of the scholarship, and official and legal commentaries on Te Tiriti have also been provided by scholars, officials and lawyers who are unable to read Te Tiriti o Waitangi in the original.”

This might be so, but it needn’t be so.

If one wants to know, accurately and precisely what the Treaty in Maori is saying, one does not have to go to ‘scholars, officials, and lawyers who are unable to read the original’ to find out.

There is a much easier path to fully and completely understanding what the Treaty in Maori is saying, but Anne does not want to tell you.

Rather, she wants to muddy the waters and confuse her readers.

She wants to keep the mystery going, or the muddying going, by spinning convoluted speculations with fanciful ideas about ‘back translations’ and ‘ancestral Māori understandings’, ‘contra proferentem rules’ ‘whakapapa lines’ ‘evolutionary theory and scientific racism’ ‘racialised readings’ and on and on she goes.

This is serious tripe.

For example, she claims that “The original gap between the understandings of the English officials who drew up the English draft of the Treaty of Waitangi, and those of the rangatira who debated and signed Te Tiriti o Waitangi in te reo was difficult to bridge, as Henry Williams and his son Edward found when they translated the English draft into Māori.”

Who says, Anne, that there was a “gap in understanding between the English officials who drew up the English draft, and the understanding of the Maori chiefs’?

Where is your proof?

This is pure speculation, springing from Ms Salmond’s fertile activist fuelled imagination.

Who says, Anne, that Henry and Edward Williams found bridging the gap between Te Reo meanings and English meanings  ‘difficult to bridge’?

Again, Anne provides no proof that this was so. She simply imagines it to be so.

The historical record shows, in fact, the very opposite of what Anne is asserting here.

Who says so? Well, Henry Williams himself.

“Henry Williams reported to Bishop Selwyn. ‘The instruction of Captain Hobson was not to allow anyone to sign the treaty till he fully understood it. To which instruction I did most strictly attend. That the natives to whom I explained the treaty understood the nature of the same, there can be no doubt.”’ (Bruce Moon. Twisting The Treaty. A Tribal Grab For Wealth And Power. Tross Publishing. 2013. p 35)

There. you have it. Clear as a bell. 

Why is Anne trying to muddy the waters?

Why does she want to make something simple (The Treaty) very complicated?

Answer?

She is an activist.

She’s also showing off, trying to sound erudite and deep. Activists often do this.  It’s a well known strategy. 

Remember when you were at school? You had good teachers and bad teachers?

The mark of a great teacher is that they simplify and clarify. They make it easy to understand.

The mark of an activist is that they complicate and confuse. They obfuscate.  That’s Anne. And she is deliberate.

She can’t and won’t accept the simple wording of the Treaty because she does not like / cannot accept what it says. To do so would be horrific.  Waititi, Packer, Marama Davidson – they are all the same.

They all have  hidden agendas. 

The Treaty of Waitangi comprises  three simple Articles, a preamble, and an Affirmation.

Even a 10 year old child can understand them.

Here they are:
Preamble:
Her Majesty Victoria, Queen of England in her gracious consideration for the chiefs and people of New Zealand, and her desire to preserve them their land and to maintain peace and order amongst them, has been pleased to appoint an officer to treat with them for the cession of the Sovereignty of their country and of the islands adjacent to the Queen. Seeing that already many of Her Majesty’s subjects have already settled in the country and are constantly arriving: And that it is desirable for their protection as well as the protection of the natives to establish a government amongst them. Her Majesty has accordingly been pleased to appoint me William Hobson a captain in the Royal Navy to be Governor of such parts of New Zealand as may now or hereafter be ceded to Her Majesty and proposes to the chiefs of the Confederation of United Tribes of New Zealand and the other chiefs to agree to the following articles.

Article 1
“The chiefs of the confederation of united tribes, and the other chiefs who have not joined the confederation, cede to the Queen of England forever the entire sovereignty of their country.”

Article 2
“The Queen of England confirms and guarantees to the chiefs and the tribes and to all the people of New Zealand, the possession of their lands, dwellings and all their property. But the chiefs of the Confederation of the United Tribes and the other chiefs grant to the Queen, the exclusive rights of purchasing such lands as the proprietors thereof may be disposed to sell at such prices as may be agreed upon between them and the person appointed by the Queen to purchase from them.”

Article 3
“In return for the cession of their sovereignty to the Queen, the people of New Zealand shall be protected by the Queen of England and the rights and privileges of British subjects will be granted to them.”

Affirmation
“Now we the chiefs of the Confederation of the United tribes of New Zealand being assembled at Waitangi, and we the other chiefs of New Zealand, having understood the meaning of these articles, accept of them and agree to them all. In witness whereof our names or marks are affixed. Done at Waitangi on the 4th of February, 1840”

This preamble, these 3 Articles, this Affirmation, are copied from the final English draft given by Hobson at 4pm on the 4th of February 1840 to Henry Williams to translate into Maori.

This draft was signed by Hobson and we have this document.

There are only two differences between this final draft and the Treaty in Maori.

One is the date. The draft is dated the 4th. The Treaty is Maori is dated the 6th.

The second difference?

The Treaty writers inserted the word ‘maori’ into Article 3 of the version in Maori so that it read ‘…the Maori people of New Zealand shall be protected….’.

Anne Salmond does not want to tell you about this draft and I have told you why.

That’s Dame Anne Salmond for you. 

Her article has back fired. 

Have a nice day. 

First, please read THIS

My commentary is in red.

Dame Tariana Turia says she has never anticipated political parties using the Treaty of Waitangi document as a way to further disenfranchise Māori from their lands and their indigenous rights in Aotearoa.
————————
First of all, our country is not called Aotearoa. It’s call New Zealand.

Second, Maori are not indigenous. Indigenous means you were here from the very beginning of time. Indigenous means you didn’t come from somewhere else to settle here.

Clearly, Maori don’t fit the definition of indigenous. They were settlers here, like everyone else.  Maori have the same rights as everyone else.  

I would challenge Maori to name just one right that non-Maori have that Maori don’t have. There are none.

What does she mean when she says “Maori were disenfranchised from their land?”  

No detail is given.  I will talk about what Maori did with their land  further down in this commentary. 

————————

She believes Pākeha have also benefited from the Treaty.

“After all, they wouldn’t be here if it wasn’t for that document,” Turia says. “I mean they are the ones who have benefited from that document and now they’re trying to use it against us.”
————————
Notice how no detail is given. When she says ‘they are the ones who have benefited from that document’ what does she mean?

She does not expand on this statement.

Why? Well, because it’s not true.

Here are the facts.

Maori invited the British to come to New Zealand.

Why? Maori were self-annihilating.

They were drunk with war, with Utu (revenge) Muru (plunder) and they could not stop killing each other.

Cannibalism was rife, as was infanticide and slavery.

Tamati Waka Nene literally pleaded with the British to come and show them how to live.

The Maori population between 1800 and 1840 went down from 150,000 to 75,000.

This was Maori killing Maori in the musket wars.

Maori had no unifying government only petty tribes at war.

Essentially, Britain came to New Zealand in the spirit of the missionary, to help a failing self-destructing cultural group avoid self annihilation.

It cost Britain a lot of money.

They were walking into a bubble of trouble, but they knew that.

Yet they did it anyway.

It cost them millions of pounds to set up hospitals, roads, bridges, schools, infrastructure, government, law and order. The list is endless.

Just look around today at literally everything Kiwis have.

All of it has come from the goodness and goodwill of the British via colonisation.

And what did it cost Maori? Absolutely nothing.

 It’s all been laid on for them.

All they had to do was sit and watch.

The benefits for Maori just rolled in, at someone else’s expense and trouble.
—————————

“You can’t have your cake and eat it too. You either believe in the document and believe in what it really stands for and the rights that it affords all of us or you keep your thoughts to yourself. I think lots of things too but I’ll have to think very carefully about expressing them.”

—————————-
Again, and as usual, no detail is given.

What does Turia believe the document stands for? She doesn’t tell us.

We must presume she does not know.

All she knows is that, “You either believe in the document and believe in what it really stands for and the rights that it affords all of us.” Absolutely no detail. No elaboration.

I will fill in for Turia and explain what she couldn’t.

The Treaty gives mandate for the establishment of democracy via the granting of British citizenship. From this, all the pillars of democracy follow:
– One person, one vote
– All votes of equal value
– All people in our nation are to be treated equally.
– No cultural group is to receive special favour.
– Apartheid is forbidden.
– Racism is forbidden.
– Private property is protected.

Maori bang on about tino rangatiratanga (a translation of the word ‘possession’ in Article two) as meaning ‘self determination’ or ‘self government’.

This is utter nonsense. It simply meant that whatever Maori owned on the 6th of February 1840 would be protected by the British.

Now this is where it gets interesting.

Research shows Maori had sold 97% of New Zealand by 1900.

So they have nothing to cry about.

What about confiscation?

Sir Apirana Ngata says they were justified.

What about any injustices?

These were investigated in 1924 by Justice Sim and reparations were completed by 1959. Done and dusted.

So why are we still paying out?

Why are settlements on-going?

The short answer?

We are being conned.

And why are we being conned?

Limp cowardly politicians with no spine are allowing it. Luxon is going to be another in a long line. 

The is precisely what David Seymour is addressing.

Let’s get behind him and support him.

P.S

What a classic statement from Tariana Turia,  in light of the small percentage of Maori genes most people claiming to be Maori (in the 21st century) now have. Exactly who is in denial?

First up, please read THIS

All this year, Luxon has shown signs of being someone who is not going to deal with New Zealand’s most serious issue.

Which is? It’s the issue of the Treaty and the fraud and corruption which has surrounded it for the last 45 years.

And why won’t he deal with it? He possesses a fatal flaw.

And what is that flaw? Cowardice.

One can’t be a leader and a coward at the same time.

You can be a manager and a coward, because a manager can organise people without the need for bravery and courage.

But a leader? No. He or she must be brave and courageous to be called a leader.

Luxon does not have this essential character quality.

He says he doesn’t want to touch the Treaty because it will cause division. In saying this, Mr Luxon is so out of touch.

He does not realise that it’s the fraudulent manipulation of the Treaty that has CAUSED the division in the first place.

And it’s only set to get worse.

Apartheid, racism, and separatism are running at an all time high in our country.

Our democracy is collapsing. Equality is no more. Free speech is no more.

At its root,  it’s all because of activists and Maori radicals fraudulently manipulating and twisting the Treaty. 

Once the fraud is complete, then they move on to bully and intimidate politicians to enact legislation which gifts them cash and assets.  It’s a complete rort, a plunder of the public purse.  A heist.  

Everyone is noticing it. Noticing what? How our country is being taken over, or Maorified.  Plundered.

Racial division is here and it’s destroying our nation, and Luxon has the power now to stop the avalanche, but refuses to.

Think about it.

The very thing he says he does not want to create (division) is already here, and the cause is obvious, but he won’t deal with it.

Either he is a fool, or a coward, or politically blind, or all three.

My pick is all three.  Basically he is terrified of Maori. 

Wouldn’t a real leader discern the root cause of division, and be brave, and deal to it? You know the answer.

Cowards sidestep these big issues.

Yesterday, Don Brash wrote an excellent piece on why David Seymour’s referendum must go ahead.

I commentated on Don’s piece. If you read the comments, you can read what I wrote.

Here is what Don wrote and what I wrote  HERE.

He calls himself Te Huia Bill Hamilton (left)

His profile on LinkedIn advertises him as being involved in several significant Maori organisations.

Recently, he was interviewed on RCR radio by Paul Brennan.

In that interview, he said some things about Julian Batchelor that were simply not true.

To put it bluntly, they were lies.

What’s interesting is the way he told those lies.

What do I mean?

Well, the lies were bold faced. No hesitation, no stuttering, no loss of pace as they were uttered.

It seemed to me that Bill Te Huia Hamilton was used to telling lies. In fact, he was very very good at it.  He was practised. 

Make up your own mind by listening to the interview HERE

You only have to listen for 3 minutes into the interview before the lies start. 

Where are all the other Maori leaders piling in on Bill Te Huia Hamilton, demanded that he ap0logise? Censoring him? Answer? Silence.  

Reason?  They must be complicit. What other conclusion is there?  Is this just normal behaviour for Maori culture? 

Te Huia Bill Hamilton is an activist Maori.

Lying is just one of the bag of tricks they use to advance their cause.

I wonder how many other lies he and other Maori activists have told over the past 45 years to the New Zealand public?

Apart from massive treaty of Waitangi fraud, brainwashing our children through their new history curriculum, brainwashing real estate agents, brainwashing medical practices, brainwashing hospital staff, lying about the health system saying it was racist when it was not, brainwashing politicians, lying about 3 Waters and what it was really all about, lying about He Puapua saying it was just a discussion document when in reality it was being rolled out in front of our eyes, lying about the new RMA, lying about tino rangatiratanga and its meaning….the list is endless.

You can read about the true meaning of tino rangatiratanga HERE  

My pick is that when an activist is talking, there is a 99% chance it’s BS.

You can read the details of this Bill Te Huia Hamilton case  HERE

We think Bill Te Huia clearly defamed Julian Batchelor so legal proceedings will start. 

Maori activists, like Bill, and others, need to be called out and exposed.   They have got away with it for years, and no one has said anything.  There has been no accountability. They have been running wild and free, wreaking havoc. 

It’s because we’ve said nothing that activists and their agenda to take over the country have got so far. 

The time for hiding and evading is over.   The time for fact checking everything they say must start. 

If you want to contribute to the legal costs, please do so into this account: 02-0261-0025679-000

Just reference your gift with ‘legal fight’.  

Bill will likely have his court costs covered by the government because he is Maori. 

We have to cover our own court costs because we are not Maori. 

This is apartheid, plain and simple, I know, but this is how it is. 

Thank you so much in advance. 

Recently Real Estate Agents were writing to us to explain how they were being forced to complete a course in Maorification.

You can read about this HERE

It was essentially heavy grooming getting the agents ready for more tribal rule in the future.

If they didn’t complete the course they could not continue as a real estate agent.

It was a case of “be Maorified, or lose your job”.

A few days ago, another sector in the work force informed us of their maorification requirements. 

What was that sector?

Medical centres throughout the county.

This is what the General Practice said.

I am not joking and this is not a prank.

————————————————–

“RNZCGP, The Royal New Zealand College of General Practicioners requires all GP Practices in New Zealand to be endorsed for general practice services with Foundation or Cornerstone Accreditation as a legal and contractual requirement.

To achieve this accreditation:

ALL staff must complete two online courses or courses in person on 

1) Treaty of Waitangi in Healthcare and 2) Cultural Competence (Maori based)

A GP practice cannot operate in NZ without this accreditation. The accreditation will not be approved without evidence of ALL staff having passed these courses. Receptionists, Admin, Nurses and Doctors.

Each separate course, online is $99.00 so it’s a total of $198.00 per staff member.

————————————————–

Discrimination, indoctrination and milking the cow is what i call it!

This was a recent meeting at the Kaipara District Council. The Maori lady speaking is a guest speaker.

When I first saw this video, I thought “This has to be staged. It just can’t be genuine, surely?”

SEE VIDEO HERE

So I phoned the Mayor of Kaipara, just to check.

And sure enough, it was genuine.

The lady talking is not acting, she is not fooling around, she’s actually being serious! OMG!

These are the kinds of people we are told we are in partnership with via the Treaty.

Seriously, who would want to have this lady or any like her in any kind of team?

Who would want her in any kind of leadership position? Who would want to be in any kind of partnership arrangement with her?

In my last blog, yesterday, I talked about Maori activists having a bag of tricks.

What are these tricks? Things like lying, bullying, intimidation, violence. threats, bluffing, acting, and so on.

On display in this video is one of the big ones: the desire to control .

And so what they do is use all their other tricks to achieve this end.

The desire to control people and situations is really what I call the King trick. It’s the one that over arches all others.

Activist Maori want to control people and situations. They are addicted to it.

This desire can be traced all the way back to pre-1840 when Maori chiefs had slaves.

And of course, the key thrill for the chief was that he had a group of people who were totally under his control. This is one reason stop cogovernance as a movement was formed.

What reason? We refuse to be slaves of the Maori elite.

Just watch this lady pull out a series of tricks from her bag of tricks to get control of the councillors in the room.

First trick? intimidation. Her demeanour is aggressive with a lot of finger pointing, arm waving, neck protrusion, and eye glaring. These are all tricks to get control of the councillors.

Second trick? voice tone. The tone is once again aggressive and accusative. She accuses the councillors of not listening, of being distracted by their phones and laptops, of not giving her their full undivided attention, of not answering her emails, of not being attentive to her every need. Voice tone is designed to break down the councillors to get control of them.

Third trick? voice volume. This is a big one for activists. They often raise their voices so as to talk over the top of people. This is why I never engage with them. They want to draw their opponents into a shouting match. You’ll never beat them with shouting louder. They have had a lot of practice in their homes, with police officers, court staff in our judiciary. Really it’s using bullying to get control.

Fourth trick, there is attitude. She talks down to the councillors in the room like they are toddlers being told off. I am surprised she did not tell them to sit up straight and fold their arms otherwise they would not be allowed out at play time. Once again, control and manipulation.

The classic instruction from her was definitely ‘no eye rolling’ and ‘no looking at each other sideways’ and ‘definitely not looking at the important papers on your desk!’ She obviously is quite familiar with how audiences in previous meetings have reacted to her. At least she is observant.

She starts off by saying she is going to ‘set expectations’ and waves her phone around. Truly, this is the stuff of Nazi Germany and the third reich.

Click on THIS link to see the reaction of one of the councillors during the meeting.

Fifth, they ignore the rules. The mayor asks her to stop but she ignores him. This goes back to the need to control and to be in control.

Sixth, there is gross hypocrisy. She demands respect, but gives none. This is typical activism behaviour. She bangs on about how she has had to take time off work to go to the council meeting, but ignores the fact that her 6 minute rant is wasting the time of 12 councillors and other staff in the room. She wants our sympathy for taking time off work.

Be wary of the sympathy card they pull. They use it a lot. The sympathy card is trick number seven.

The eighth trick? arrogance. She thinks she is a hot shot, and amazing, but really, for all the above reasons, she is the opposite. A loser, in fact.

Number 9? , delusion. She advises the council that they should consult with “experts”. Who are these experts? Manu Whenua, she says. This would make a good Tui Beer advert. “Yeah, right”. As such, she is delusional.

Tenth trick? ignorance. She accuses the council of shirking their Treaty obligations. What were those obligations? To set up democracy and rule. What does that mean for the people of New Zealand? Submitting to the authority of the government. What does that mean?

Given that local councils are representative of ‘government’, this activist, by pulling out her bag of tricks in the council meeting, is breaching the Treaty. How so? She is not submitting to government. Rather, she is trying to ride rough shod over it and take control.

How should we conclude?

In yesterday’s blog I talked about activists being toddlers in adult bodies.

This lady is a prime example.

The real hero in the room is Mayor Craig Jepson.

Why? He shut her down, and was applauded by other councillors for doing it.

My only criticism of Craig was that he was six minutes too late in making that call.

But all was not lost, It was playtime anyway at the Kaipara council kindy.

The image below is from South Africa in the 60’s. It says CAUTION. BEWARE OF NATIVES

Kiwis in the 1970’s and 80’s were so horrified by this image, and others, coming out of South Africa that we took to the streets in protest.

And rightly so.

Yet now, only a short 40 of so years later, we are promoting Maori only this that and the other thing.

In other words, we are promoting apartheid.

What would you think if the sign said ‘CAUTION. BEWARE OF WHITE PEOPLE’ and such signs began to appear all over New Zealand.

Sound ridiculous? Not so.

The signs have not started to appear yet, but the ideas have. Yep, big time. Apartheid is back in New Zealand.

Where?

Well, the latest to surface is the plan by the government to designate huge areas of the Hauraki Gulf as MAORI ONLY FISHING AREAS

Hard to believe it’s actually happening, but it is.

It’s only a proposal at this stage, but the very fact that the people drafting this legislation are serious about implementing it is a real concern.  

The fact is, their proposal is not a sick joke.  They are deadly serious.

You can read the story HERE

Your children, our children, are deliberately being brainwashed at school.

This morning a parent sent me an email with a great example.

Check out the picture below.

The reason they are being brainwashed?

Activists have made it clear they want to what they call ‘groom’ the next batch of voters coming through.

What this means is that they are grooming our children to vote for all things Maori when they are old enough to vote.

In other words, schools have changed from places of leaning into being idealogical Maorification centres.

If you have more examples of how your children are being brainwashed at school, please send them to me. Julian@stopcogov.kiwi

First, watch THIS VIDEO

My question is this – if Maori are only interested in truth, the truth about the Treaty, why would the Maori Party and Maori radicals want to oppose what David Seymour is wanting to do?

That is to say, if Maori are telling the truth about the Treaty, walking in the truth of the Treaty, and standing on the Truth of the Treaty, they would have nothing to fear.

Truth speaks for itself. 

But they are not standing on the truth. This why they are so worried. 

They are standing on 45 years of lies, deception, bullying, and intimidation.

The only reason they are opposing David Seymour is because he is threatening to bring to truth out in the open. 

He is going to take the covers off 45 years of lies, deception, trickery, the loss of billions of dollars and assets fraudulently obtained by Maori over all those years. 

What does interest them, more than anything, is keeping the gravy train going.

——————————————

A COMMENT ABOUT THE WORD ‘RACIST’

The Maori Party and Maori Radicals and their fellow white woke travellers have weaponised the word ‘racist’ to shut down opposition so that they can carry on with their plans to take over the country unopposed.

Labelling people ‘racist’ is just a cheap psychological trick.

But when you ask them what a racist is, they don’t know, as we have just seen in the video.

Now here’s the thing-most Kiwis don’t know what a racist is either. All they know is that it’s not nice to be called a racist.

So to avoid being called a racist, they stop opposing anything racist that the Maori Party and radical Maori are doing.

They “Keep their heads down and keep quiet”

So we come full circle back to being exactly where the Maori Party and radical Maori want us to be which is?

Lying down, keeping our mouths shut, not opposing anything they say or do.

This is a completely wrong response.  Surely, surely, you can see what’s going on here? 

The irony is, we (i.e. Stop co-governance and all our supporters) are not racist at all.  In fact, we are the ones standing up against racism!

We must recognise how all this works, and stand up and fight the coup and those who are driving it. 

What’s more important – you being labelled a racist, and taking it on the chin and not worrying about it, and taking a stand by taking up the fight, or you getting sucked in by their cheap psychological tricks, lying down, shutting up, and losing your country? You know the answer.

Take the heat, grow some, take it on the chin when you are called ‘racist!’ and start openly and radically opposing the coup.

Stop being a sissy and make a stand.

Dear Damian,

I was surprised to see the following on the screen in Sylvia park

There are no defined principals of the treaty, there are only the actual articles signed in 1840, by the Maoris and Queen Victoria’s representative, Period.

These “Principals” you speak of are not related to the articles, they were created in 1986 when Jeffery Palmer our PM at the time inserted the term “the principals of the treaty” into legalisation. They were and still remain undefined by parliament.

These statements on your screens are racist, they disregard the facts surrounding the origins of Maori and their incredible journey to reach NZ in the 14th Century

We are one people in New Zealand and this racist separation promoted by Hoyts is unwanted by the vast majority of New Zealanders.

This is no different to when on the 14th October the Australian people spoke clearly and overwhelmingly with a no – they rejected racist separation for Australians, just as we will in New Zealand

When you separate one group of our society based on race over all other New Zealanders you promote separatism, disharmony and racism. I would remind you that Racism is illegal in New Zealand.

Just so you are aware “Tangata whenua” means all people born in New Zealand not just one race

These statements are a highly political issue in New Zealand and not something businesses and you representing your shareholders should not be involved in taking political positions on

These messages are offensive to most New Zealanders including Maori

I hope Hoyts can reconsider there position on promoting racial disharmony in New Zealand

Regards

Ian

You can read the story HERE

A different home owner wrote to me. You can read her story
—————————–

Hi Julian and Brooke,
Don’t you think it is time to start getting a signed partition going for a stop co-governance referendum and putting it forward to govt so they have to take action.

I don’t think the majority of NZers have any idea of the repocussions of co-governance nor the probability that racism catering to a minority group of elite tribal Maori will undermine NZ and all NZers, the justice system and every other govt department and basically enslave us all except elite tribal Maori to lives of complete and utter control by Elite tribal Maori.

I live in the west coast and the te tai poutini plan which is claiming historical Maori significance to large areas of land including my very small lifestyle block, which never had any such significance.

This means that I will have to go to nga taihu or local Maori tribe to get permission to do what I want with my land. Submissions are being heard, however delays due to numerous mistakes made by the incompetent designers/instigators/council managers of the whole sorry corrupt racist travesty that I call limposter land control”, are holding up the process.

I see it as an illegal way to again take what is not theirs to take.

It won’t be long before elite tribal Maori will control the whole shibang.

Nothing less than a third world country under elite tribal Maori dictatorship. I for one have had enough.

I sure as hell am as angry and disgusted with continuing govts to have let it get to this contemptuous stage considering that most of co-governance has been formulated on myths, deceit and BS.

Mary

Earlier this year, the Taupo Council stopped Julian Batchelor from speaking at one of their council owned buildings

The Free Speech Union said this was illegal.

So they are mounting a legal challenge against the council.

You can read the story HERE

Massage Therapist Denied Accreditation For Not Being Able To Do “Maori Massage”

A person who is a qualified massage therapist with an NZQA Level 6 Diploma in Therapeutic Massage and holds a New Zealand Massage registration rang ACC to apply for accreditation with them. This person is a New Zealand citizen raised in NZ.

They asked her what her iwi was.

She replied that she did not have one and asked how she could get one.

ACC asked her if she knew Miri Miri Maori massage.

She replied that she could learn it.

Even though she was willing to learn Miri Miri Maori massage, she was still denied. She was not able to be an ACC Massage Therapist because she did not have an iwi and was not trained in Miri Miri Maori Massage. This is a shocking case of racism.

This highly experienced and qualified massage therapist was turned down on her race. Her experience did not matter.
There is a Maori woman in her area who is ACC registered and who only does Miri Miri Maori massage.

In spite of widespread opposition, it looks like Auckland Council are going to go ahead and vote in Maori Wards.

To do this is to trash democracy.

You can find out how you can try and stop this by clicking HERE

This is about the lunatic left. Watch the video HERE

Over the pass 45 years activists have used the phrase ‘tino rangatirtanga’ to plunder New Zealand’s cash and assets.

You never hear anyone question them about it. 

 This is why they have got away with so much

No more.

To read about what ‘tino rangatiratanga’ really means, read THIS

Please pass this on to everyone everywhere.

He is the clearest example of what tribal rule will be like that you will ever get.

Watch THIS video

What Tamihere is saying is ‘If you don’t do what we want, we’ll get violent”

This is terrorist talk. 

Is this how you want New Zealand to be run?  Would you like this kind of leadership?

He also talks about ‘the tyranny of the majority’.

What does this mean?

For Tamihere it means that what the majority think (i.e. in a democracy, the majority are the people who vote a political party into government) does not matter.

All that matters, according to Tamihere, is what Maori think and want.

What does this tell us?

It tells us that Maori are only interested in what Maori want.

The rest of us don’t matter.  They are not ‘for’ New Zealand. They are for Maori only.

They are not interested in democracy, or democratic process. 

In other words, Maori want to be the chiefs of New Zealand, and the rest of us slaves.

The slaves have no say, and are of no consequence. They want to take us all the way back to pre-1840 New Zealand.

This is how the leaders of tribal rule think.

They say their justification “is in the Treaty”. Let me say categorically, it is not in the Treaty.

All their demands are based on Treaty fraud and trickery.

Tamihere threatens “through his networks” to shut down Whangarei, Auckland, Tauranga, Wellington etc”

Oh really?

He bluffing. He’s trying to sound like a lion, like the King of the jungle, but really he is a kitten.

Our response?

If Tamihere and co want to get violent and shut down the country if their demands are not met, then we say “Bring it on”.

We will not be bullied and intimidated.

What matters is that the truth about Treaty fraud and corruption over the last 45 years is brought into the light and exposed.

What matters is the preservation of democracy and equality. What matters is that we eliminate apartheid and racism from New Zealand.

And if there is a cost to preserving the former, and eliminating the latter, and bringing the truth of the Treaty to light, then we will count the cost.

If our soldiers went to war to preserve the former and eliminate the latter, and lost their lives doing it, then what sacrifice of ours is too great? 

When we take up this fight, we take the baton from our soldiers in the two great wars.

We say again, bring it on.

National is not going to stop co-governance.

The opposite in fact. They are going to keep it going.

They say they are not in favour of co-governance with respect to social services, like hospitals. This is to be commended.

But they are fully in favour when it comes to what they call ‘the management of natural resources’.

By this they mean the management of rivers, lakes, mountains, the ocean etc.

This is completely wrong. Why?

If the new National government wants to “co-manage” (this is what they are calling it to get away from the controversial term ‘co-governance’ but really they are the same thing) natural resources with private enterprise, they should use a tender process to allow all the 160 cultures living here to have a go at winning the tender.

Why should one cultural group be given priority, to the exclusion of all others?

Aren’t we supposed to be living in a democracy – One law for all, equal opportunity for all, yes?

It’s crucial to hold on to these if we want to live in a democracy.

Anything less is apartheid, and racist, and a breach of the Treaty which guaranteed equality for all (Article 3).

National doesn’t seem to think democracy is important.

For them, apartheid and racism is better.  We are going to fight to stop this.

First, read THIS

John Tamihere and James Shaw are threatening violence if anyone touches the Treaty.

This is the Maori way. Might is right. This is tribal rule in action.

In other words, “If you don’t agree with us, we get violent!”

Is this the way you want New Zealand to be ruled?

From 1975 when the Treaty of Waitangi Act was passed until now, this is how activists have got their way.

Threats and intimidation.  Politicians have caved into them.

Luxon looks set to do this. Cave in.

Are we going to let this continue to happen? No way!

We need to get to the bottom of all the Treaty fraud and corruption over the past 45 years and put an end to it.

What Tamihere and Shaw want is for the population of New Zealand to turn a blind eye so that Maori can march on unopposed to 2040.  

Why 2040.  This is the date set down in the He Puapua report that Maori will have complete control of New Zealand.

National won by a convincing majority.

Sure, this is infinitely better than Labour, the Greens, and the Maori Party returning.

But the fact that Act and New Zealand First did not get a bigger share of the votes is a big worry.

A bigger share for them would have meant more leverage to stop National from continuing with co-governance.

Act and NZ First are the two parties wanting to expunge co-governance from all New Zealand legislation.

Expunge means to get rid of it completely.

With a smaller vote count, a smaller slice of the vote pie, this is not going to happen.

Act will have fewer people around the Cabinet table. NZ First will have none.

It’s the Cabinet table that counts. This is where the big decisions are made.

What we need now, desperately, is a strong powerful Prime Minister who will put New Zealand into co-governance remission.

Luxon is not that man.

Roll on election 2026.

Meanwhile, as a movement, for the next three years at least, we are going to fight on, stronger than ever, to stop co-governance.

LINDA RABSON ON THE ELECTION RESULT

ATTENTION: INCOMING PRIME MINISTER CHRISTOPHER LUXON – YOU HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY – TAKE IT

As expected, the Labour Government has suffered the worst defeat in its history and no everyone, it had nothing to do with Covid-19.

Yes, the billions of dollars (necessary) paid out has affected our economy – but much like the rest of the world that can be corrected with a capable Government – the main reason was another (misguided ideology).

The absolute hatred for the division of NZ can only be laid at the door of the Jacinda Ardern / Chris Hipkins’ dictatorship. The people no longer recognise our country – both need to take a bow.

International community – Former PM Ardern was instructed to resign (she did not want to) by her own party due to the hatred of her by the people and what she had forced upon us – it was already clear at that time with her in power the Labour party was guaranteed to lose.

Upon taking up the baton – former PM Chris Hipkins had an opportunity to stop with the greed and the not-mandated implementation of Apartheid Rule / Co-governance – he chose not to and was repaid last night (for his arrogance) with a landslide loss of power.

APARTHEID RULE / CO-GOVERNANCE

Consequently, Christopher Luxon / Davis Seymour the country expects urgent action on what has devastated NZ (because that is what is required) to put a stop to the gold-plated “junket” that is the gravy-train being exploited by the Maori Elite.

The incredible landslide loss of power (by Labour) was due solely to the introduction (by stealth) of Apartheid Rule / Co-governance.

STOP CO-GOVERNANCE – JULIAN BATCHELOR

Rest assured, the work that Julian Batchelor has put in (on behalf of his country) has paid off.

He has spent a lot of his time and money in alerting the general public to the dangers and undemocratic process that is Co-governance.

Julian, and your team, on behalf of the NZ public – thank you.

Those of us who understand what is going on (and in the absence of a Fourth Estate) know the incredible personal cost that such battles take.

Last night’s loss of Election 2023 is testimony of that, and incoming Prime Minister Christopher Luxon would do well to heed the lesson.

I understand from your videos that you will continue the fight until Co-governance is well and truly stopped. Unfortunately, this is still required as the incoming National-led Government won’t be so quick to end the “jobs for the boys” – let’s not forget, it’s an extremely lucrative gold-plated gravy train.