Try Our New Treaty Of Waitangi Quiz!

Try Our New Treaty Of Waitangi Quiz!

Click on THIS link to try the test.

What's the point? Radical Maori have gotten away with fraud and corruption all because Kiwis don't know the Treaty.

That is to say, they were not able to say 'No!' to many of the interpretations and ideas dished out in front of them  because they did not know truth of the matter.

Now, at last, you can know the truth and push back.

Do the test over and over until you become an expert - someone who can argue and debate the issue intelligently from a place of facts and truth.

Remember, in the end, truth always wins, but you need to know the truth to be in the right position to win.

Want More Details On How You Can Help With Billboards In Your Area?

Click HERE 

Please Help Us Get Our Billboards Up Around The Country!

Please Help Us Get Our Billboards Up Around The Country!

Stop Co-Governance is deadly serious about protecting democracy, free speech, one person one vote, all votes of equal value, and equal opportunities.

We think it’s worth fighting to stop racism and apartheid, Treaty of Waitangi fraud and corruption, and attempts by elite Maori to take over our country by stealth, trickery, and deceit.

Defending the one and attacking the other successfully requires skillful and relentless communication – booklets, flyers, blogs, emails, phone calls, marches, placards, banners, seminars, and….wait for it…billboards!

Billboards are an incredibly effective way to raise awareness and keep the issue top of mind. All political parties know this. Just look around the streets prior to an election.

Billboards cement a message for motorists, as they see them day after day, travelling to and from work.

The fact is, if we want to stop co-governance, we won’t do it without billboards. They are an incredible tool.

Below are just some of the designs we have come up with. You will think of others, and we welcome this. 

If you like to help by putting a billboard on your property, or your fence, and you want to know how to do it, click HERE

You can view more design ideas HERE and HERE and HERE

More Threats. Marama Davidson Vows "We Will Be Resisting Julian Batchelor's Rubbish!"

More Threats. Marama Davidson Vows "We Will Be Resisting Julian Batchelor's Rubbish!"

Start by reading THIS

After yesterday’s election recount result, Marama Davidson has come out swinging.

She calls Julian Batchelor’s message to New Zealand ‘rubbish’ but as to be expected, no examples given, and no detail provided.

For Marama, it’s rubbish for no other reason than Marama says it is.

She claims Julian Batchelor is creating division.

But is this true?

No, it’s not true. Julian is fighting for all New Zealanders against apartheid, racism, and separatism.

He’s fighting for all New Zealanders to preserve democracy which is one person one vote and all votes of equal value.

He’s fighting for all New Zealanders to stop one racial group being favoured over another.

Hitler wanted to favour one racial group against another, and look what happened.

The Maori Party, the Greens, and The Labour Party want to favour one racial group over all others, just like Hitler.

Who is that group? Maori.

Why is the media not exposing this? Why are they not picking up on this? Why are they not calling it out for what it truly is?

Answer? The $55m Public Interest Journalism fund which is still bubbling away.

So, no, Julian Batchelor is not creating division.

It’s the Maori Party, The Greens, and the Labour Party who are creating the division.

And Luxon, Seymour, and Peters better stop it by going to the root cause.

You can read the root cause HERE

More On The Indoctrination Of Health Care Workers

Check out the screenshots below

Don't Be Fooled By Dame Anne Salmond.  She's An Activist

Don't Be Fooled By Dame Anne Salmond. She's An Activist

 Start by reading THIS

This latest piece by Anne Salmond is serious tripe.

How so?

Anne says “Much of the scholarship, and official and legal commentaries on Te Tiriti have also been provided by scholars, officials and lawyers who are unable to read Te Tiriti o Waitangi in the original.”

This might be so, but it needn’t be so.

If one wants to know, accurately and precisely what the Treaty in Maori is saying, one does not have to go to ‘scholars, officials, and lawyers who are unable to read the original’ to find out.

There is a much easier path to fully and completely understanding what the Treaty in Maori is saying, but Anne does not want to tell you.

Rather, she wants to muddy the waters and confuse her readers.

She wants to keep the mystery going, or the muddying going, by spinning convoluted speculations with fanciful ideas about ‘back translations’ and ‘ancestral Māori understandings’, ‘contra proferentem rules’ ‘whakapapa lines’ ‘evolutionary theory and scientific racism’ ‘racialised readings’ and on and on she goes.

This is serious tripe.

For example, she claims that “The original gap between the understandings of the English officials who drew up the English draft of the Treaty of Waitangi, and those of the rangatira who debated and signed Te Tiriti o Waitangi in te reo was difficult to bridge, as Henry Williams and his son Edward found when they translated the English draft into Māori.”

Who says, Anne, that there was a “gap in understanding between the English officials who drew up the English draft, and the understanding of the Maori chiefs’?

Where is your proof?

This is pure speculation, springing from Ms Salmond’s fertile activist fuelled imagination.

Who says, Anne, that Henry and Edward Williams found bridging the gap between Te Reo meanings and English meanings  ‘difficult to bridge’?

Again, Anne provides no proof that this was so. She simply imagines it to be so.

The historical record shows, in fact, the very opposite of what Anne is asserting here.

Who says so? Well, Henry Williams himself.

“Henry Williams reported to Bishop Selwyn. ‘The instruction of Captain Hobson was not to allow anyone to sign the treaty till he fully understood it. To which instruction I did most strictly attend. That the natives to whom I explained the treaty understood the nature of the same, there can be no doubt.”’ (Bruce Moon. Twisting The Treaty. A Tribal Grab For Wealth And Power. Tross Publishing. 2013. p 35)

There. you have it. Clear as a bell. 

Why is Anne trying to muddy the waters?

Why does she want to make something simple (The Treaty) very complicated?


She is an activist.

She’s also showing off, trying to sound erudite and deep. Activists often do this.  It’s a well known strategy. 

Remember when you were at school? You had good teachers and bad teachers?

The mark of a great teacher is that they simplify and clarify. They make it easy to understand.

The mark of an activist is that they complicate and confuse. They obfuscate.  That’s Anne. And she is deliberate.

She can’t and won’t accept the simple wording of the Treaty because she does not like / cannot accept what it says. To do so would be horrific.  Waititi, Packer, Marama Davidson – they are all the same.

They all have  hidden agendas. 

The Treaty of Waitangi comprises  three simple Articles, a preamble, and an Affirmation.

Even a 10 year old child can understand them.

Here they are:
Her Majesty Victoria, Queen of England in her gracious consideration for the chiefs and people of New Zealand, and her desire to preserve them their land and to maintain peace and order amongst them, has been pleased to appoint an officer to treat with them for the cession of the Sovereignty of their country and of the islands adjacent to the Queen. Seeing that already many of Her Majesty’s subjects have already settled in the country and are constantly arriving: And that it is desirable for their protection as well as the protection of the natives to establish a government amongst them. Her Majesty has accordingly been pleased to appoint me William Hobson a captain in the Royal Navy to be Governor of such parts of New Zealand as may now or hereafter be ceded to Her Majesty and proposes to the chiefs of the Confederation of United Tribes of New Zealand and the other chiefs to agree to the following articles.

Article 1
“The chiefs of the confederation of united tribes, and the other chiefs who have not joined the confederation, cede to the Queen of England forever the entire sovereignty of their country.”

Article 2
“The Queen of England confirms and guarantees to the chiefs and the tribes and to all the people of New Zealand, the possession of their lands, dwellings and all their property. But the chiefs of the Confederation of the United Tribes and the other chiefs grant to the Queen, the exclusive rights of purchasing such lands as the proprietors thereof may be disposed to sell at such prices as may be agreed upon between them and the person appointed by the Queen to purchase from them.”

Article 3
“In return for the cession of their sovereignty to the Queen, the people of New Zealand shall be protected by the Queen of England and the rights and privileges of British subjects will be granted to them.”

“Now we the chiefs of the Confederation of the United tribes of New Zealand being assembled at Waitangi, and we the other chiefs of New Zealand, having understood the meaning of these articles, accept of them and agree to them all. In witness whereof our names or marks are affixed. Done at Waitangi on the 4th of February, 1840”

This preamble, these 3 Articles, this Affirmation, are copied from the final English draft given by Hobson at 4pm on the 4th of February 1840 to Henry Williams to translate into Maori.

This draft was signed by Hobson and we have this document.

There are only two differences between this final draft and the Treaty in Maori.

One is the date. The draft is dated the 4th. The Treaty is Maori is dated the 6th.

The second difference?

The Treaty writers inserted the word ‘maori’ into Article 3 of the version in Maori so that it read ‘…the Maori people of New Zealand shall be protected….’.

Anne Salmond does not want to tell you about this draft and I have told you why.

That’s Dame Anne Salmond for you. 

Her article has back fired. 

Have a nice day. 


Yet Another Maori Leader Talking Nonsense.This Time Dame Tariana Turia

Yet Another Maori Leader Talking Nonsense.This Time Dame Tariana Turia

First, please read THIS

My commentary is in red.

Dame Tariana Turia says she has never anticipated political parties using the Treaty of Waitangi document as a way to further disenfranchise Māori from their lands and their indigenous rights in Aotearoa.
First of all, our country is not called Aotearoa. It’s call New Zealand.

Second, Maori are not indigenous. Indigenous means you were here from the very beginning of time. Indigenous means you didn’t come from somewhere else to settle here.

Clearly, Maori don’t fit the definition of indigenous. They were settlers here, like everyone else.  Maori have the same rights as everyone else.  

I would challenge Maori to name just one right that non-Maori have that Maori don’t have. There are none.

What does she mean when she says “Maori were disenfranchised from their land?”  

No detail is given.  I will talk about what Maori did with their land  further down in this commentary. 


She believes Pākeha have also benefited from the Treaty.

“After all, they wouldn’t be here if it wasn’t for that document,” Turia says. “I mean they are the ones who have benefited from that document and now they’re trying to use it against us.”
Notice how no detail is given. When she says ‘they are the ones who have benefited from that document’ what does she mean?

She does not expand on this statement.

Why? Well, because it’s not true.

Here are the facts.

Maori invited the British to come to New Zealand.

Why? Maori were self-annihilating.

They were drunk with war, with Utu (revenge) Muru (plunder) and they could not stop killing each other.

Cannibalism was rife, as was infanticide and slavery.

Tamati Waka Nene literally pleaded with the British to come and show them how to live.

The Maori population between 1800 and 1840 went down from 150,000 to 75,000.

This was Maori killing Maori in the musket wars.

Maori had no unifying government only petty tribes at war.

Essentially, Britain came to New Zealand in the spirit of the missionary, to help a failing self-destructing cultural group avoid self annihilation.

It cost Britain a lot of money.

They were walking into a bubble of trouble, but they knew that.

Yet they did it anyway.

It cost them millions of pounds to set up hospitals, roads, bridges, schools, infrastructure, government, law and order. The list is endless.

Just look around today at literally everything Kiwis have.

All of it has come from the goodness and goodwill of the British via colonisation.

And what did it cost Maori? Absolutely nothing.

 It’s all been laid on for them.

All they had to do was sit and watch.

The benefits for Maori just rolled in, at someone else’s expense and trouble.

“You can’t have your cake and eat it too. You either believe in the document and believe in what it really stands for and the rights that it affords all of us or you keep your thoughts to yourself. I think lots of things too but I’ll have to think very carefully about expressing them.”

Again, and as usual, no detail is given.

What does Turia believe the document stands for? She doesn’t tell us.

We must presume she does not know.

All she knows is that, “You either believe in the document and believe in what it really stands for and the rights that it affords all of us.” Absolutely no detail. No elaboration.

I will fill in for Turia and explain what she couldn’t.

The Treaty gives mandate for the establishment of democracy via the granting of British citizenship. From this, all the pillars of democracy follow:
– One person, one vote
– All votes of equal value
– All people in our nation are to be treated equally.
– No cultural group is to receive special favour.
– Apartheid is forbidden.
– Racism is forbidden.
– Private property is protected.

Maori bang on about tino rangatiratanga (a translation of the word ‘possession’ in Article two) as meaning ‘self determination’ or ‘self government’.

This is utter nonsense. It simply meant that whatever Maori owned on the 6th of February 1840 would be protected by the British.

Now this is where it gets interesting.

Research shows Maori had sold 97% of New Zealand by 1900.

So they have nothing to cry about.

What about confiscation?

Sir Apirana Ngata says they were justified.

What about any injustices?

These were investigated in 1924 by Justice Sim and reparations were completed by 1959. Done and dusted.

So why are we still paying out?

Why are settlements on-going?

The short answer?

We are being conned.

And why are we being conned?

Limp cowardly politicians with no spine are allowing it. Luxon is going to be another in a long line. 

The is precisely what David Seymour is addressing.

Let’s get behind him and support him.


What a classic statement from Tariana Turia,  in light of the small percentage of Maori genes most people claiming to be Maori (in the 21st century) now have. Exactly who is in denial?

"I Told You So".  Luxon Shows He Is A Coward By Refusing To Deal With New Zealand's Most Serious Issue.

"I Told You So". Luxon Shows He Is A Coward By Refusing To Deal With New Zealand's Most Serious Issue.

First up, please read THIS

All this year, Luxon has shown signs of being someone who is not going to deal with New Zealand’s most serious issue.

Which is? It’s the issue of the Treaty and the fraud and corruption which has surrounded it for the last 45 years.

And why won’t he deal with it? He possesses a fatal flaw.

And what is that flaw? Cowardice.

One can’t be a leader and a coward at the same time.

You can be a manager and a coward, because a manager can organise people without the need for bravery and courage.

But a leader? No. He or she must be brave and courageous to be called a leader.

Luxon does not have this essential character quality.

He says he doesn’t want to touch the Treaty because it will cause division. In saying this, Mr Luxon is so out of touch.

He does not realise that it’s the fraudulent manipulation of the Treaty that has CAUSED the division in the first place.

And it’s only set to get worse.

Apartheid, racism, and separatism are running at an all time high in our country.

Our democracy is collapsing. Equality is no more. Free speech is no more.

At its root,  it’s all because of activists and Maori radicals fraudulently manipulating and twisting the Treaty. 

Once the fraud is complete, then they move on to bully and intimidate politicians to enact legislation which gifts them cash and assets.  It’s a complete rort, a plunder of the public purse.  A heist.  

Everyone is noticing it. Noticing what? How our country is being taken over, or Maorified.  Plundered.

Racial division is here and it’s destroying our nation, and Luxon has the power now to stop the avalanche, but refuses to.

Think about it.

The very thing he says he does not want to create (division) is already here, and the cause is obvious, but he won’t deal with it.

Either he is a fool, or a coward, or politically blind, or all three.

My pick is all three.  Basically he is terrified of Maori. 

Wouldn’t a real leader discern the root cause of division, and be brave, and deal to it? You know the answer.

Cowards sidestep these big issues.

Yesterday, Don Brash wrote an excellent piece on why David Seymour’s referendum must go ahead.

I commentated on Don’s piece. If you read the comments, you can read what I wrote.

Here is what Don wrote and what I wrote  HERE.

Senior Maori Leader Found Lying In Radio Interview

Senior Maori Leader Found Lying In Radio Interview

He calls himself Te Huia Bill Hamilton (left)

His profile on LinkedIn advertises him as being involved in several significant Maori organisations.

Recently, he was interviewed on RCR radio by Paul Brennan.

In that interview, he said some things about Julian Batchelor that were simply not true.

To put it bluntly, they were lies.

What’s interesting is the way he told those lies.

What do I mean?

Well, the lies were bold faced. No hesitation, no stuttering, no loss of pace as they were uttered.

It seemed to me that Bill Te Huia Hamilton was used to telling lies. In fact, he was very very good at it.  He was practised. 

Make up your own mind by listening to the interview HERE

You only have to listen for 3 minutes into the interview before the lies start. 

Where are all the other Maori leaders piling in on Bill Te Huia Hamilton, demanded that he ap0logise? Censoring him? Answer? Silence.  

Reason?  They must be complicit. What other conclusion is there?  Is this just normal behaviour for Maori culture? 

Te Huia Bill Hamilton is an activist Maori.

Lying is just one of the bag of tricks they use to advance their cause.

I wonder how many other lies he and other Maori activists have told over the past 45 years to the New Zealand public?

Apart from massive treaty of Waitangi fraud, brainwashing our children through their new history curriculum, brainwashing real estate agents, brainwashing medical practices, brainwashing hospital staff, lying about the health system saying it was racist when it was not, brainwashing politicians, lying about 3 Waters and what it was really all about, lying about He Puapua saying it was just a discussion document when in reality it was being rolled out in front of our eyes, lying about the new RMA, lying about tino rangatiratanga and its meaning….the list is endless.

You can read about the true meaning of tino rangatiratanga HERE  

My pick is that when an activist is talking, there is a 99% chance it’s BS.

You can read the details of this Bill Te Huia Hamilton case  HERE

We think Bill Te Huia clearly defamed Julian Batchelor so legal proceedings will start. 

Maori activists, like Bill, and others, need to be called out and exposed.   They have got away with it for years, and no one has said anything.  There has been no accountability. They have been running wild and free, wreaking havoc. 

It’s because we’ve said nothing that activists and their agenda to take over the country have got so far. 

The time for hiding and evading is over.   The time for fact checking everything they say must start. 

If you want to contribute to the legal costs, please do so into this account: 02-0261-0025679-000

Just reference your gift with ‘legal fight’.  

Bill will likely have his court costs covered by the government because he is Maori. 

We have to cover our own court costs because we are not Maori. 

This is apartheid, plain and simple, I know, but this is how it is. 

Thank you so much in advance. 


Real Estate Agents Targeted For Indoctrination. The Next Group? Medical Practices.

Real Estate Agents Targeted For Indoctrination. The Next Group? Medical Practices.

Recently Real Estate Agents were writing to us to explain how they were being forced to complete a course in Maorification.

You can read about this HERE

It was essentially heavy grooming getting the agents ready for more tribal rule in the future.

If they didn’t complete the course they could not continue as a real estate agent.

It was a case of “be Maorified, or lose your job”.

A few days ago, another sector in the work force informed us of their maorification requirements. 

What was that sector?

Medical centres throughout the county.

This is what the General Practice said.

I am not joking and this is not a prank.


“RNZCGP, The Royal New Zealand College of General Practicioners requires all GP Practices in New Zealand to be endorsed for general practice services with Foundation or Cornerstone Accreditation as a legal and contractual requirement.

To achieve this accreditation:

ALL staff must complete two online courses or courses in person on 

1) Treaty of Waitangi in Healthcare and 2) Cultural Competence (Maori based)

A GP practice cannot operate in NZ without this accreditation. The accreditation will not be approved without evidence of ALL staff having passed these courses. Receptionists, Admin, Nurses and Doctors.

Each separate course, online is $99.00 so it’s a total of $198.00 per staff member.


Discrimination, indoctrination and milking the cow is what i call it!

Good afternoon Julian

So called ‘cultural safety courses’ have to go!

The practice of gratuitous imposition of courses in cultural understanding and sensitivity seems likely to continue.

In some employment fields, and medicine is one, a measure of cultural sensitivity is obviously a good thing; it is the exploitation of that good thing for political intent that is both objectionable and dangerous.

Because it is a good thing if done with sincere intent and appropriate moderation, it is not always easy to define the point at which the good thing becomes objectionable and hence warrants opposition.

Co-governance itself is easy to identify and hence to oppose; opposition to courses in cultural understanding is a more complex matter particularly in fields like medicine and education.

We know that Maori activists will exploit them for their own ends, but pinning down the point at which the exploitation begins and so should be opposed is often difficult.

Hence, I wonder if, in this area of concern, an alternative strategy might be considered, namely that of “overload”.

Instead of questioning and opposing cultural understanding courses, we might, with reference to Article 3 of the Treaty, agitate for the extension of them to cover all 160 cultures now present in New Zealand.

And we might with good cause allege that Maori (as evidenced by Te Pati Maori) are spectacularly lacking in understanding of, sensitivity towards, and interest in other cultures, so are prime examples of people in need of cultural sensitivity training.

Having established that, we might then move on to provide examples of the kind of things that people in medical practices should be aware of.

Just for starters, being of Scottish descent, I would expect all personnel at my local GP Practice to be aware of and sensitive to the following:

1. that I am of Clan Gordon and I do not want to find myself in the Waiting Room with anyone associated with a clan that was on the other side at Culloden
2. that I continue to suffer from inter-generational trauma resulting from the Clearances
3. that appointment bookings should be managed so as to avoid having anyone of MacDonald and Campbell descent in the Waiting Room at the same time, otherwise there could be a re-run of the Massacre of Glencoe.
4. that any dietary advice I am given should not go so far as to suggest that I refrain from consumption of haggis
5. that a range of specified traditional Scots expressions will be understood by medical practice staff

This is just for starters; a comprehensive list would be much longer and, of course, there remain 159 other cultures whose requirements would have to be added. Scottish people enjoy their culture and, I am sure, would enter into this exercise with great gusto, as would the French and the Irish.

And, just for good measure, anyone who questioned or opposed extending such training to all 159 other cultures would be a self-identified racist.

I trust this provides food for constructive thought.

Best wishes


Cultural Safety Courses Have To Go

Maori Activists Default To Their Biggest Tricks To Stop The Act Party Referendum : Threats, Bullying, And Intimidation

Maori Activists Default To Their Biggest Tricks To Stop The Act Party Referendum : Threats, Bullying, And Intimidation

This was a recent meeting at the Kaipara District Council. The Maori lady speaking is a guest speaker.

When I first saw this video, I thought “This has to be staged. It just can’t be genuine, surely?”


So I phoned the Mayor of Kaipara, just to check.

And sure enough, it was genuine.

The lady talking is not acting, she is not fooling around, she’s actually being serious! OMG!

These are the kinds of people we are told we are in partnership with via the Treaty.

Seriously, who would want to have this lady or any like her in any kind of team?

Who would want her in any kind of leadership position? Who would want to be in any kind of partnership arrangement with her?

In my last blog, yesterday, I talked about Maori activists having a bag of tricks.

What are these tricks? Things like lying, bullying, intimidation, violence. threats, bluffing, acting, and so on.

On display in this video is one of the big ones: the desire to control .

And so what they do is use all their other tricks to achieve this end.

The desire to control people and situations is really what I call the King trick. It’s the one that over arches all others.

Activist Maori want to control people and situations. They are addicted to it.

This desire can be traced all the way back to pre-1840 when Maori chiefs had slaves.

And of course, the key thrill for the chief was that he had a group of people who were totally under his control. This is one reason stop cogovernance as a movement was formed.

What reason? We refuse to be slaves of the Maori elite.

Just watch this lady pull out a series of tricks from her bag of tricks to get control of the councillors in the room.

First trick? intimidation. Her demeanour is aggressive with a lot of finger pointing, arm waving, neck protrusion, and eye glaring. These are all tricks to get control of the councillors.

Second trick? voice tone. The tone is once again aggressive and accusative. She accuses the councillors of not listening, of being distracted by their phones and laptops, of not giving her their full undivided attention, of not answering her emails, of not being attentive to her every need. Voice tone is designed to break down the councillors to get control of them.

Third trick? voice volume. This is a big one for activists. They often raise their voices so as to talk over the top of people. This is why I never engage with them. They want to draw their opponents into a shouting match. You’ll never beat them with shouting louder. They have had a lot of practice in their homes, with police officers, court staff in our judiciary. Really it’s using bullying to get control.

Fourth trick, there is attitude. She talks down to the councillors in the room like they are toddlers being told off. I am surprised she did not tell them to sit up straight and fold their arms otherwise they would not be allowed out at play time. Once again, control and manipulation.

The classic instruction from her was definitely ‘no eye rolling’ and ‘no looking at each other sideways’ and ‘definitely not looking at the important papers on your desk!’ She obviously is quite familiar with how audiences in previous meetings have reacted to her. At least she is observant.

She starts off by saying she is going to ‘set expectations’ and waves her phone around. Truly, this is the stuff of Nazi Germany and the third reich.

Click on THIS link to see the reaction of one of the councillors during the meeting.

Fifth, they ignore the rules. The mayor asks her to stop but she ignores him. This goes back to the need to control and to be in control.

Sixth, there is gross hypocrisy. She demands respect, but gives none. This is typical activism behaviour. She bangs on about how she has had to take time off work to go to the council meeting, but ignores the fact that her 6 minute rant is wasting the time of 12 councillors and other staff in the room. She wants our sympathy for taking time off work.

Be wary of the sympathy card they pull. They use it a lot. The sympathy card is trick number seven.

The eighth trick? arrogance. She thinks she is a hot shot, and amazing, but really, for all the above reasons, she is the opposite. A loser, in fact.

Number 9? , delusion. She advises the council that they should consult with “experts”. Who are these experts? Manu Whenua, she says. This would make a good Tui Beer advert. “Yeah, right”. As such, she is delusional.

Tenth trick? ignorance. She accuses the council of shirking their Treaty obligations. What were those obligations? To set up democracy and rule. What does that mean for the people of New Zealand? Submitting to the authority of the government. What does that mean?

Given that local councils are representative of ‘government’, this activist, by pulling out her bag of tricks in the council meeting, is breaching the Treaty. How so? She is not submitting to government. Rather, she is trying to ride rough shod over it and take control.

How should we conclude?

In yesterday’s blog I talked about activists being toddlers in adult bodies.

This lady is a prime example.

The real hero in the room is Mayor Craig Jepson.

Why? He shut her down, and was applauded by other councillors for doing it.

My only criticism of Craig was that he was six minutes too late in making that call.

But all was not lost, It was playtime anyway at the Kaipara council kindy.

Huge Area Of Hauraki Gulf To Be Designated "Maori Only Fishing". This is apartheid, plain and simple.

Huge Area Of Hauraki Gulf To Be Designated "Maori Only Fishing". This is apartheid, plain and simple.

The image below is from South Africa in the 60’s. It says CAUTION. BEWARE OF NATIVES

Kiwis in the 1970’s and 80’s were so horrified by this image, and others, coming out of South Africa that we took to the streets in protest.

And rightly so.

Yet now, only a short 40 of so years later, we are promoting Maori only this that and the other thing.

In other words, we are promoting apartheid.

What would you think if the sign said ‘CAUTION. BEWARE OF WHITE PEOPLE’ and such signs began to appear all over New Zealand.

Sound ridiculous? Not so.

The signs have not started to appear yet, but the ideas have. Yep, big time. Apartheid is back in New Zealand.


Well, the latest to surface is the plan by the government to designate huge areas of the Hauraki Gulf as MAORI ONLY FISHING AREAS

Hard to believe it’s actually happening, but it is.

It’s only a proposal at this stage, but the very fact that the people drafting this legislation are serious about implementing it is a real concern.  

The fact is, their proposal is not a sick joke.  They are deadly serious.

You can read the story HERE

Our Children Are Being Deliberately Brainwashed At School.

Our Children Are Being Deliberately Brainwashed At School.

Your children, our children, are deliberately being brainwashed at school.

This morning a parent sent me an email with a great example.

Check out the picture below.

The reason they are being brainwashed?

Activists have made it clear they want to what they call ‘groom’ the next batch of voters coming through.

What this means is that they are grooming our children to vote for all things Maori when they are old enough to vote.

In other words, schools have changed from places of leaning into being idealogical Maorification centres.

If you have more examples of how your children are being brainwashed at school, please send them to me.

Look At The Picture Below

This is sent to Board of Trustees, which is in turn sent to all teacher. 

If this is not brainwashing, what is? 

Why Are Maori So Worried About Act And David Seymour's "Principles Of The Treaty" Being Defined?

Why Are Maori So Worried About Act And David Seymour's "Principles Of The Treaty" Being Defined?

First, watch THIS VIDEO

My question is this – if Maori are only interested in truth, the truth about the Treaty, why would the Maori Party and Maori radicals want to oppose what David Seymour is wanting to do?

That is to say, if Maori are telling the truth about the Treaty, walking in the truth of the Treaty, and standing on the Truth of the Treaty, they would have nothing to fear.

Truth speaks for itself. 

But they are not standing on the truth. This why they are so worried. 

They are standing on 45 years of lies, deception, bullying, and intimidation.

The only reason they are opposing David Seymour is because he is threatening to bring to truth out in the open. 

He is going to take the covers off 45 years of lies, deception, trickery, the loss of billions of dollars and assets fraudulently obtained by Maori over all those years. 

What does interest them, more than anything, is keeping the gravy train going.



The Maori Party and Maori Radicals and their fellow white woke travellers have weaponised the word ‘racist’ to shut down opposition so that they can carry on with their plans to take over the country unopposed.

Labelling people ‘racist’ is just a cheap psychological trick.

But when you ask them what a racist is, they don’t know, as we have just seen in the video.

Now here’s the thing-most Kiwis don’t know what a racist is either. All they know is that it’s not nice to be called a racist.

So to avoid being called a racist, they stop opposing anything racist that the Maori Party and radical Maori are doing.

They “Keep their heads down and keep quiet”

So we come full circle back to being exactly where the Maori Party and radical Maori want us to be which is?

Lying down, keeping our mouths shut, not opposing anything they say or do.

This is a completely wrong response.  Surely, surely, you can see what’s going on here? 

The irony is, we (i.e. Stop co-governance and all our supporters) are not racist at all.  In fact, we are the ones standing up against racism!

We must recognise how all this works, and stand up and fight the coup and those who are driving it. 

What’s more important – you being labelled a racist, and taking it on the chin and not worrying about it, and taking a stand by taking up the fight, or you getting sucked in by their cheap psychological tricks, lying down, shutting up, and losing your country? You know the answer.

Take the heat, grow some, take it on the chin when you are called ‘racist!’ and start openly and radically opposing the coup.

Stop being a sissy and make a stand.

Complain To Hoyts Cinemas

Look at the picture below. This is appearing in Hoyts cinemas.

What wrong with it? It’s brain washing.

But hang on, what, specifically, is wrong with it? 

First, Maori are not Tangata Whenua. This means ‘people of the land’.

Maori take this to mean ‘the first people of the land’ or ‘the most important people of the land’

Or ‘the people in the land who everyone must show respect’. 

No, there are 5 million people here and 160 cultures. We are all equal. So singling out one group over the rest is racist.

Second, Maori were not the first people here.

There is strong evidence that other people groups were here before them.

So Hoyts is advertising at worst lies, at best highly controversial opinion.

There is absolutely no scientific proof Maori were the first here. 

In fact, there is strong evidence other people groups were here before them.  

They are definitely not indigenous. 

Third, Aotearoa is not the official name of our country. It never has been. This change was never mandated by the 5 million people of New Zealand.

Rather, it was forced on them by the radical Maori racists in collaboration with a corrupt media.

Using the word Aotearoa is now highly offensive to many Kiwis. 

Fourth, when Hoyts says “we pay respects to such and such,……”  this is blatantly racist.

I re-iterate, whenever one racial group is elevated over another,, this is evidence of racism at play, and of the spreading of apartheid.

So in summary, it could rightly be said that Hoyts is propagating lies, racism, apartheid, inequality, and historical controversy.

This is a message to Hoyts Cinemas.

“If you want to stop people coming to your theatres, and start losing revenue, and keep offending people, keep up this advertising.”

Let Hoyts know you object strongly to all this. 

Email their CEO

Letter to Hoyts

Letter to Hoyts

CEO of an Auckland company

Dear Damian,

I was surprised to see the following on the screen in Sylvia park

There are no defined principals of the treaty, there are only the actual articles signed in 1840, by the Maoris and Queen Victoria’s representative, Period.

These “Principals” you speak of are not related to the articles, they were created in 1986 when Jeffery Palmer our PM at the time inserted the term “the principals of the treaty” into legalisation. They were and still remain undefined by parliament.

These statements on your screens are racist, they disregard the facts surrounding the origins of Maori and their incredible journey to reach NZ in the 14th Century

We are one people in New Zealand and this racist separation promoted by Hoyts is unwanted by the vast majority of New Zealanders.

This is no different to when on the 14th October the Australian people spoke clearly and overwhelmingly with a no – they rejected racist separation for Australians, just as we will in New Zealand

When you separate one group of our society based on race over all other New Zealanders you promote separatism, disharmony and racism. I would remind you that Racism is illegal in New Zealand.

Just so you are aware “Tangata whenua” means all people born in New Zealand not just one race

These statements are a highly political issue in New Zealand and not something businesses and you representing your shareholders should not be involved in taking political positions on

These messages are offensive to most New Zealanders including Maori

I hope Hoyts can reconsider there position on promoting racial disharmony in New Zealand



More and More Kiwis Are Pushing Back Against Maori Language

More a more Kiwis are pushing back against the forcing of Te Reo in New Zealand.

The incident reported in the newspaper report below is just one of dozens happening all around the country.

We hear about them because people sent us photos of what they are noticing / seeing as they go about their day.

By the way, the statistics about the number of kiwis who know the Maori language or who speak a bit of it is fake.

The ‘statistics’ and this ‘research’ are contrived. They are attempts to ‘talk into being’ something which is not.

Anne Tolley is well known as the queen of woke.

More Homeowners Suffer Possible Private Property Loss As A Result of Iwi Interference.

More Homeowners Suffer Possible Private Property Loss As A Result of Iwi Interference.

You can read the story HERE

A different home owner wrote to me. You can read her story

Hi Julian and Brooke,
Don’t you think it is time to start getting a signed partition going for a stop co-governance referendum and putting it forward to govt so they have to take action.

I don’t think the majority of NZers have any idea of the repocussions of co-governance nor the probability that racism catering to a minority group of elite tribal Maori will undermine NZ and all NZers, the justice system and every other govt department and basically enslave us all except elite tribal Maori to lives of complete and utter control by Elite tribal Maori.

I live in the west coast and the te tai poutini plan which is claiming historical Maori significance to large areas of land including my very small lifestyle block, which never had any such significance.

This means that I will have to go to nga taihu or local Maori tribe to get permission to do what I want with my land. Submissions are being heard, however delays due to numerous mistakes made by the incompetent designers/instigators/council managers of the whole sorry corrupt racist travesty that I call limposter land control”, are holding up the process.

I see it as an illegal way to again take what is not theirs to take.

It won’t be long before elite tribal Maori will control the whole shibang.

Nothing less than a third world country under elite tribal Maori dictatorship. I for one have had enough.

I sure as hell am as angry and disgusted with continuing govts to have let it get to this contemptuous stage considering that most of co-governance has been formulated on myths, deceit and BS.


Free Speech Union Goes To Bat Against Taupo Council Who Stopped Julian Batchelor From Speaking

Free Speech Union Goes To Bat Against Taupo Council Who Stopped Julian Batchelor From Speaking

Earlier this year, the Taupo Council stopped Julian Batchelor from speaking at one of their council owned buildings

The Free Speech Union said this was illegal.

So they are mounting a legal challenge against the council.

You can read the story HERE

Massage Therapist Denied Accreditation For Not Being Able To Do "Maori Massage"

Massage Therapist Denied Accreditation For Not Being Able To Do "Maori Massage"

Massage Therapist Denied Accreditation For Not Being Able To Do “Maori Massage”

A person who is a qualified massage therapist with an NZQA Level 6 Diploma in Therapeutic Massage and holds a New Zealand Massage registration rang ACC to apply for accreditation with them. This person is a New Zealand citizen raised in NZ.

They asked her what her iwi was.

She replied that she did not have one and asked how she could get one.

ACC asked her if she knew Miri Miri Maori massage.

She replied that she could learn it.

Even though she was willing to learn Miri Miri Maori massage, she was still denied. She was not able to be an ACC Massage Therapist because she did not have an iwi and was not trained in Miri Miri Maori Massage. This is a shocking case of racism.

This highly experienced and qualified massage therapist was turned down on her race. Her experience did not matter.
There is a Maori woman in her area who is ACC registered and who only does Miri Miri Maori massage.

Say No To Maori Wards On Auckland Council.

Say No To Maori Wards On Auckland Council.

In spite of widespread opposition, it looks like Auckland Council are going to go ahead and vote in Maori Wards.

To do this is to trash democracy.

You can find out how you can try and stop this by clicking HERE

Feel Like A Good Laugh? Then watch this!

Feel Like A Good Laugh? Then watch this!

This is about the lunatic left. Watch the video HERE

What Does 'Tino Rangatiratanga' mean? How Activists Have fraudulently Used These Words To Plunder New Zealand

What Does 'Tino Rangatiratanga' mean? How Activists Have fraudulently Used These Words To Plunder New Zealand

Over the pass 45 years activists have used the phrase ‘tino rangatirtanga’ to plunder New Zealand’s cash and assets.

You never hear anyone question them about it. 

 This is why they have got away with so much

No more.

To read about what ‘tino rangatiratanga’ really means, read THIS

Please pass this on to everyone everywhere.

John Tamihere Video Alarming.  He Says Maori Will Resort To Violence If They Don't Get What They Demand.

John Tamihere Video Alarming. He Says Maori Will Resort To Violence If They Don't Get What They Demand.

He is the clearest example of what tribal rule will be like that you will ever get.

Watch THIS video

What Tamihere is saying is ‘If you don’t do what we want, we’ll get violent”

This is terrorist talk. 

Is this how you want New Zealand to be run?  Would you like this kind of leadership?

He also talks about ‘the tyranny of the majority’.

What does this mean?

For Tamihere it means that what the majority think (i.e. in a democracy, the majority are the people who vote a political party into government) does not matter.

All that matters, according to Tamihere, is what Maori think and want.

What does this tell us?

It tells us that Maori are only interested in what Maori want.

The rest of us don’t matter.  They are not ‘for’ New Zealand. They are for Maori only.

They are not interested in democracy, or democratic process. 

In other words, Maori want to be the chiefs of New Zealand, and the rest of us slaves.

The slaves have no say, and are of no consequence. They want to take us all the way back to pre-1840 New Zealand.

This is how the leaders of tribal rule think.

They say their justification “is in the Treaty”. Let me say categorically, it is not in the Treaty.

All their demands are based on Treaty fraud and trickery.

Tamihere threatens “through his networks” to shut down Whangarei, Auckland, Tauranga, Wellington etc”

Oh really?

He bluffing. He’s trying to sound like a lion, like the King of the jungle, but really he is a kitten.

Our response?

If Tamihere and co want to get violent and shut down the country if their demands are not met, then we say “Bring it on”.

We will not be bullied and intimidated.

What matters is that the truth about Treaty fraud and corruption over the last 45 years is brought into the light and exposed.

What matters is the preservation of democracy and equality. What matters is that we eliminate apartheid and racism from New Zealand.

And if there is a cost to preserving the former, and eliminating the latter, and bringing the truth of the Treaty to light, then we will count the cost.

If our soldiers went to war to preserve the former and eliminate the latter, and lost their lives doing it, then what sacrifice of ours is too great? 

When we take up this fight, we take the baton from our soldiers in the two great wars.

We say again, bring it on.

Ron Writes: "Tamihere A Terrorist!"

“No doubt John Tamihere is correct, that it is quite likely some Maori will resort to violence if they don’t get what they want. After all there is a long history of that approach, including the ToW being signed as a desperate attempt to escape the violence being perpetrated on each other. Violence clearly was very much integral to the Maori way of life as an accepted method of getting what tribes wanted, a deeply ingrained trait that’s not going away any time soon.
“The tyranny of the majority” is also a hardly surprising perspective, coming from a tribal aristocrat. Worrying though when the person, clearly no supporter of democracy, was at one time a prominent member of a Labour Government.
In any case this kind of talk should be making us all the more determined to see a full return to democracy with racism gone.  If that means dealing with some violence, so be it.”

National Is Going to Keep Co-Governance Going

National Is Going to Keep Co-Governance Going

National is not going to stop co-governance.

The opposite in fact. They are going to keep it going.

They say they are not in favour of co-governance with respect to social services, like hospitals. This is to be commended.

But they are fully in favour when it comes to what they call ‘the management of natural resources’.

By this they mean the management of rivers, lakes, mountains, the ocean etc.

This is completely wrong. Why?

If the new National government wants to “co-manage” (this is what they are calling it to get away from the controversial term ‘co-governance’ but really they are the same thing) natural resources with private enterprise, they should use a tender process to allow all the 160 cultures living here to have a go at winning the tender.

Why should one cultural group be given priority, to the exclusion of all others?

Aren’t we supposed to be living in a democracy – One law for all, equal opportunity for all, yes?

It’s crucial to hold on to these if we want to live in a democracy.

Anything less is apartheid, and racist, and a breach of the Treaty which guaranteed equality for all (Article 3).

National doesn’t seem to think democracy is important.

For them, apartheid and racism is better.  We are going to fight to stop this.

Maori Threaten Violence If Treat Of Waitangi Is Touched

Maori Threaten Violence If Treat Of Waitangi Is Touched

First, read THIS

John Tamihere and James Shaw are threatening violence if anyone touches the Treaty.

This is the Maori way. Might is right. This is tribal rule in action.

In other words, “If you don’t agree with us, we get violent!”

Is this the way you want New Zealand to be ruled?

From 1975 when the Treaty of Waitangi Act was passed until now, this is how activists have got their way.

Threats and intimidation.  Politicians have caved into them.

Luxon looks set to do this. Cave in.

Are we going to let this continue to happen? No way!

We need to get to the bottom of all the Treaty fraud and corruption over the past 45 years and put an end to it.

What Tamihere and Shaw want is for the population of New Zealand to turn a blind eye so that Maori can march on unopposed to 2040.  

Why 2040.  This is the date set down in the He Puapua report that Maori will have complete control of New Zealand.


Mr Luxon:- Re your comment on a referendum on the am show this morning!!!

Firstly I make it quite clear that I am not racist. I believe that all NZERS should have the same opportunities, rights, and ability to have a good life with equality for all no matter what race, colour, creed, culture or beliefs so long as they abiide by the laws of the country and respect each other.

What is devisive and racist is not letting the majority have a say, not letting them know the facts and letting the minority take all under co-governance. Being blackmailed by the few reverting to violence (as per James shaw and John tamahere via Ryan Bridges) and holding the country to ransom by these means is not democracy. Not to have a a referendum under this type of threat is overtly one sided, offensive, devisive and undemocratic. You might think it easier and common sense not to hold a referendum. The problem with common sense is that it is not that common, and the problem with easy is that the easy way out is avoidance and a cop out. WHAT ARE YOU SO AFRAID OF. DO YOU THINK that not allowing a referendum is fair to all NZers!!!. WHY are we not allowed a choice. I was an avid supporter of National. However this is the reason WHY I VOTED ACT AND NOT NATIONAL BECAUSE I HAD ALREADY WORKED OUT YOUR AVOIDANCE OF THE ISSUE. I HOPE THAT ANOTHER ROUND OF JACINDERISM (a game of hide and seek disinformation, no information) UNDER NATIONAL RE CO-GOVERNANCE WILL NOT PURSUE. Mr Peters appears to have a better handle on the fundamental devisive values of co-governance, and the historical fact that Maori came from Hawaiki so therefore are not indigenous, therefore no more entitled than any other NZER, specifically so because they ceeded to British law and we were all given equal rights under British law and the treaty. Regardless of your political differences I do hope that you do consider his knowledge and opinion on the subject of co-governance and for that matter the interpretation of the treaty and the myths.

NZers were under informed about co-governance and the consequences and outcomes of co-governance and refusing to give the countrys peoples the information in full and the opportunity to have their say is no better than socialistic communism. In short political sculdugery. It is not racist it is how a TRUELY fair process of democracy works and the end result has been decided fairly. I believe in freedom of speech and democracy and will be willing to accept the outcome of a referendum. Australia has just persued this process why can’t we.

Luxon, Be Strong! Don't Give In To Tamihere's Threats

National Are "In" But Co-Governance Rumbles On

National Are "In" But Co-Governance Rumbles On

National won by a convincing majority.

Sure, this is infinitely better than Labour, the Greens, and the Maori Party returning.

But the fact that Act and New Zealand First did not get a bigger share of the votes is a big worry.

A bigger share for them would have meant more leverage to stop National from continuing with co-governance.

Act and NZ First are the two parties wanting to expunge co-governance from all New Zealand legislation.

Expunge means to get rid of it completely.

With a smaller vote count, a smaller slice of the vote pie, this is not going to happen.

Act will have fewer people around the Cabinet table. NZ First will have none.

It’s the Cabinet table that counts. This is where the big decisions are made.

What we need now, desperately, is a strong powerful Prime Minister who will put New Zealand into co-governance remission.

Luxon is not that man.

Roll on election 2026.

Meanwhile, as a movement, for the next three years at least, we are going to fight on, stronger than ever, to stop co-governance.



As expected, the Labour Government has suffered the worst defeat in its history and no everyone, it had nothing to do with Covid-19.

Yes, the billions of dollars (necessary) paid out has affected our economy – but much like the rest of the world that can be corrected with a capable Government – the main reason was another (misguided ideology).

The absolute hatred for the division of NZ can only be laid at the door of the Jacinda Ardern / Chris Hipkins’ dictatorship. The people no longer recognise our country – both need to take a bow.

International community – Former PM Ardern was instructed to resign (she did not want to) by her own party due to the hatred of her by the people and what she had forced upon us – it was already clear at that time with her in power the Labour party was guaranteed to lose.

Upon taking up the baton – former PM Chris Hipkins had an opportunity to stop with the greed and the not-mandated implementation of Apartheid Rule / Co-governance – he chose not to and was repaid last night (for his arrogance) with a landslide loss of power.


Consequently, Christopher Luxon / Davis Seymour the country expects urgent action on what has devastated NZ (because that is what is required) to put a stop to the gold-plated “junket” that is the gravy-train being exploited by the Maori Elite.

The incredible landslide loss of power (by Labour) was due solely to the introduction (by stealth) of Apartheid Rule / Co-governance.


Rest assured, the work that Julian Batchelor has put in (on behalf of his country) has paid off.

He has spent a lot of his time and money in alerting the general public to the dangers and undemocratic process that is Co-governance.

Julian, and your team, on behalf of the NZ public – thank you.

Those of us who understand what is going on (and in the absence of a Fourth Estate) know the incredible personal cost that such battles take.

Last night’s loss of Election 2023 is testimony of that, and incoming Prime Minister Christopher Luxon would do well to heed the lesson.

I understand from your videos that you will continue the fight until Co-governance is well and truly stopped. Unfortunately, this is still required as the incoming National-led Government won’t be so quick to end the “jobs for the boys” – let’s not forget, it’s an extremely lucrative gold-plated gravy train.