In September of this year, I spoke in Warkworth on the issue of co-governance, and why it was so wrong.
To date, 4200 people have viewed this video since it was posted on your tube 2 weeks ago.
Roughly 300 Kiwis at day are watching it.
If two or more people are watching it at the same time, the number of kiwis who heard my message could be as high as 12,000.
Analytics on the back end of my video manager show people are watching from start to finish.
I wish 5 million had heard it! It’s the truth. It blows the lid off all the BS being pumped out by elite Maori to take over New Zealand.
You can watch the video here.
Yesterday, in the comments on this video on Youtube, someone called Karri-Ann Vercoe-Black attacked my Warkworth speech.
Have a look. Go to the comments on the video
I have replied to Karri-Ann’s comments, and posted them on Youtube.
In my comments to Karri-Ann on Youtube, there is a hyperlink to an article on the Treaty which every Kiwi should read.
Join in the discussion! Post your own comments. The more comments, the more the video goes up the Google rankings.
And please, and most importantly, keep the video circulating. Awareness is the key to change.
Julian I’m 100% in agreement with your messages, though perhaps less of a fan of the evangelistic presentation style. Never mind.
However, I do think it is important to properly address clause 2 of the ToW, in particular: “..protect the chiefs, the subtribes and all the people of New Zealand in the unqualified exercise of their chieftainship over their lands..”, where “chieftainship” could and has been taken out of context to mean sovereignty.
What’s particularly telling though is the applicability of “chieftainship” to “all of the people of New Zealand”. So the notion of “chieftainship” clearly has broader applicability than Maori tribes, which makes sense when understood as in the notes of the Waitangi Tribunal as more like “trusteeship” or perhaps “custodianship”. In other words the Crown will protect the rights of property owners, which is of course central to British law and that of most democratic countries. Nothing to do with co-governing.
Do keep up the good work. Cheers, Ron.
Ron, with all due respect, you are reading the wrong Treaty. There is only one Treaty, Te Tiriti. In Article 2 of Te Tiriti, there is absolutely no mention of “in the unqualified exercise of their chieftainship over their lands…”. You are referring to Hugh Kawharu’s fraudulent version. Dump it.
Julian, apologies, only just read your reply, which seems fair enough, particularly after reading your Treaty analysis, including of terms such as ‘chieftainship’. Although what I don’t really understand is your point about the Maori version, from the perspective that the Littlewood English original would surely be the authoritative version, whereas a Maori version of that is always going to lose something in translation, and indeed translation back into English, particularly as these languages aren’t from the same root.
Ron, This is a paper I put on another site which gives the correct information about the Treaty. https://stopcogovernance.kiwi/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Treaty-of-Waitangi-fake-and-true-a-short-history.pdf
Queen Victoria’s Royal Charter, Our True Founding Document and First Constitution by One Zealand Foundation (ONZF) has a back translation from the original Te Tiriti o Waitangi by Mr T E Young, Native Department, 1869 in it.
It also has the final draft of the Treaty of Waitangi (Littlewood Document) along side for easy comparison of one with the other.
New Zealand is in Serious trouble
The so called indigenous race – Maori – 16.5% of the New Zealand population
are gaining power far beyond their due.
Oh you hadn’t noticed – well have you recently looked at what schools are teaching and have taught your kids. Yes your kids. Surely they have provided you with a new perspective of how Maori stand in the scheme of things.
The Government in their wisdom (or is it Maori manipulation) are influencing the adoption of Maori cultural beliefs that mislead the maturing minds of our children. Mystical, spiritual beliefs that we could well do without. New Zealanders need to move forward and cast off spiritual crutches of the past. Yes if Maori need these beliefs non Maori should not discourage them but equally so non Maori should not be forced to know about or adopt things Maori.
You only need to peek at the written history of Europe, the Mediterranean, Arabia and China to see how far behind culturally, and technologically the so called Maori nation’s culture is. And we are allowing Maori to infiltrate and influence our education system, our democratic governance and our legal structures.
Hmmn – still not on board. Well let me give you some facts.
Indigenous or not the Maoris arrived in New Zealand over a period of approx 300 years commencing around 1300AD (in other words 540 years prior to the Treaty – some 22 generations). Although they were never one race none of them advanced culturally or technologically until the arrival of non Maori in the late 1700s AD.
Some examples:
1) – Maori had no wheel.
2) – Maori had no bow and arrow.
3) – Maori had no written language.
4) – Maori claim spiritual relationships with the flora and fauna – yet they caused – the Moa
to become extinct plus a number of other birds and mammals and burnt off 40% of
New Zealand’s forests.
Of course to encapsulate the ‘indigenous ’ label and all its rewards they deny the existence of the so called Moriori and possibly others who preceded them. There is absolutely no proof that Maori are the indigenous race of New Zealand and no one has the right to claim such. It has become a simplified political correctness totally lacking proof.
So lets put this in perspective.
1) – the so called Maori nation never existed.
2) – Maori have no claim to being indigenous.
3) – Maori have no claim to calling New Zealand Aotearoa as it was never a word adopted
by the waring, scattered and divided Maoris in New Zealand.
4) – Maori men regarded themselves as warriors – when some were provided with muskets
and learnt how to us them they immediately slaughtered any tribe that they regarded
as enemies (the musket wars).
4) – Maori have no claim to being friends of the earth any more than any other culture that
used the flora and fauna available virtually in order to exist (‘Maori burnt 40% of New
Zealand’s forest within 200 years of Māori settling in New Zealand – devastating the
flora and fauna’) – (’Maori hunted the flightless Moa to extinction’).
5) – Maori had no written language. Their stories were passed down verbally generation to
generation – well we all know how that can be seriously influenced by bias,
exaggeration, needs of the time – I could go on and on – so why are non Maori New
Zealanders expected to believe any of it.
In other words Maori are just citizens of New Zealand with no more or less political, spiritual or cultural power than any other New Zealand citizen.
This is not a racist statement it is a statement of unity – every New Zealander equal under, and within, the law with cultural and religious beliefs respected but not forced on any New Zealander.
New Zealand school ciriculum must be secular avoiding any religious or cultural teachings that tend to separate pupil from pupil. This secular approach gives confidence to parents of any religion or culture who expect to have their children educated at a government funded public school.
Adopting this form of education will result in future generations of New Zealanders, no matter what their cultural background, being proud to say ‘I’m a New Zealander’ and equal to any other New Zealander.