In case you missed it over the past few days, let’s start today with the best 15 second video ever. I was tearing up with joy watching it. Click HERE
You can read today blog HERE
DON’T FORGET PLEASE! The mayor of the Kaipara district council is being interviewed on the Platform (a radio station) at 7AM MONDAY 30TH JANUARY. Be sure to tune in and email the station with your support for him. The Mayor is Craig Jepson. Craig is batting for us against Sport Northland who banned us from using their facility because we were against co-governance. He was the mayor who refused to have a Maori prayer at the beginning of this council meetings, remember? The email address of the station is hello@theplatform.kiwi
If the radio station get’s lots of emails from us, it will encourage them to keep going with this topic, which is what we want.
“And this tells us all we need to know – because the mark of a true leader is that they do not leave to others what they are not willing to do themselves.
Ardern’s ultimate legacy will be as a shirker of responsibility”
This is the sixth Labour Govt. Everyone of them has done the same thing. Lest NZ looking like a third World Country.
Ardern has been no different, and she knows it, hence heading for the hills.
I support equal rights for all , not superior rights not for an elite on an racial basis
“So, as the media’s love affair with Ardern wanes “
WANES!!!! Come bloody off it. Those bastards are/were her slaves. Their slavering, lefty Govt money-grubbing maori speaking attitudes and their absolute disregard for the truth were / are the most blatant in modern history. The NZ media machine is rotten to the core. Every company in NZ should stop advertising through them for a month or two and break their sorry arses.
Congratulation to Caroline DI Russo for her excellent article describing the worst and most evil PM NEW ZEALAND has witnessed in its history. Also thanks to STOP CO-GOVERNANCE for publishing Caroline’s truth about the Evil Witch who prostituted herself to stardom. Caroline’s article clearly shows not all women were duped by the Cindy Witch’s deceit. NEW ZEALAND needs more women like Caroline to speak up and dispel the myth that Cindy was all kind and compassionate. [How can the most intelligent rational person say nice things about a person who deliberately sets out to destroy a democratic country]
It seems all our Prime Ministers have a habit of leaving a mess to be cleaned up.
The Three Prime Ministers destroyed our democracy, then quit.
1. Prime Minister Geoffrey Palmer, when Attorney General wrote, “The Five Principle for Crown Action on the Treaty Waitangi”, then quit politics and left it to Mike Moore to clean up.
2. Prime Minister John Key signed, “The Declaration on the rights of Indigenous People”, then quit politics and left it to Bill English to clean up.
3. Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern introduced the “Three Waters and Co-Governance”, then quit politics and left it to Christopher Hipkins to clean up.
Unfortunately, none of them cleaned up, they just carried on destroying our democracy one after the other!!!
Ardern and her government has done more harm to NewZealanders the very people she made an oath to protect and serve
Due to her Covid mandates she will be known as the prime minister that has killed the most people that she promised to protect
One New Zealand Foundation Inc,
That sums it up and the stupid ignorant apathetic masses still venerate these scumbags.
Palmer especially irks as I well remember his comment that he was running for mayor of Auckland because he was “struggling to survive on my parliamentary pension”!
WTF?
He was the one that pushed through the unelected Maori Supremacist oversight comity of councils with absolute right of veto on anything that did not meet Iwi approval.
Barry, Leading Constitutional Lawyer and the man that instigating all the reforms, Sir Geoffrey Palmer stated, “It is true the Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975 and all the other statutes, which give explicit recognition to the Treaty are not entrenched. They can be swept away by a simple majority in Parliament”.
So all we need is a simple majority in Parliament!
It will not be hard to find a majority in Parliament who are “simple”, but to find a “simple” majority in Parlaiment will be impossible!!!!!!!
“Ardern’s ultimate legacy will be as a shirker of responsibility.”
This is true but not so much because she ran for the hills when many of the fawning masses started to realise that they’d been conned, but because her authoritarian, racially divisive agenda was a self-indulgent shirking of responsibility, a corruption of the baton that had been handed to her, that is handed to any New Zealand prime minister, to maintain the values and principles of a long standing liberal democracy.
3C has done exactly what it was instructed to do by her masters. It is a global communist through and through.
How many took note of the fact that the heinous Helen Clark ‘retired’ from her U.N.G.C. position to return to New Zealand and continue mentoring 3C?
Much like Henry Kissinger continues with his prized student Klaus Schwab.
As much as I hate to say it 3C has done its job exceedingly well. Now it will fade away very much the richer for having done so.
Julian. I have extensively read and agree with what you are attempting to do. Its way overdue and hard to know who to trust when you read much of what is written. NZ has no definition of “indigenous people” and I strongly suspect that Maori (of which all are mixed race and Maori by choice) are far from indigenous.
I make 3 points:
• In reply to Ross Bakers call for a class action, Treaty Article 2 gave “The Crown” pre-emptive rights pursuant to land purchase. There has been much discussion recently regarding Maori ceding sovereignty. Claire Charters (herself a half cast and contributor to He Puapua) believes they did not cede sovereignty. Article 1 of the treaty is expressly clear. Knowingly or otherwise Maori gave up sovereignty and for them to declare otherwise is a breach. For my argument, whether Maori gave up sovereignty or not is irrelevant. In most cases “The Crown” purchased land from Maori with the intension of on sale to what Maori call Pakeha. Article 3 gives those Pakeha purchasers/residents English law protection. The new emigrants would have been familiar with the water reticulation systems which by 1840 were common throughout urban England. Further, well recorded riparian legal rights were commonplace and express land sale deeds confirm this.
My point to has got nothing whatsoever to do with Maori. “The Crown” purchased land from Maori and on sold that land (Remember, land and water are inextricably linked. One is no good without the other) to settlers. With “The Crown” and support and knowledge, the settlors then went about, as in England reticulating water throughout their towns and cities to service their newly purchased allotments. After reading your Mr Graeme Pages piece on 3 waters, it now appears that in 2023 the very same “Crown” intends stealing that water reticulating system along with the water that flows through it and giving ultimate control to Maori. Whether is not that theft is a breach of the treaty of not is irrelevant. It is most certainly a breach by “The Crown” of guarantees given to emigrants that the law of England applied in New Zealand in 1840. I also note that a significant amount of the land that Maori found difficult to sell to “The Crown” was the Southern Alps and that Maori now want authority over DOC land. With the greatest of respect to those who historically and now control these events, That land is catchment land for many of tour major rivers. The rivers are nothing without catchment land.
This needs a class action against the government, and, we have 6 years from the time the three waters is accented into law. The Governor General should be ashamed of herself
• I urge you to view https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2fGVbMYp54 pursuant to Critical Race Theory.
• Please advise of your events in Blenheim.
This is what I have been watching this afternoon.
The true meaning of the Treaty of Waitangi with Martin Doutre.
https://counterspinmedia.com/?s=episode+19&post_type=resourceepisode
I am going to post this. Thanks for doing the research.
A possible solution to this massive fraud which began with Matiu Rata under the 3rd Labour Government is laid out in part 2 beginning at 1.28.00.
This is also the beginning of the summation for those who have limited time to watch both.
MP Matiu Rata had a pet project in mind that would require a particular English language version of the treaty to be brought into our legislation to sit alongside Te Tiriti o Waitangi and be Co-Equal to it, in authority when drafting laws or understandings based upon the treaty. The version he wanted was dubbed by him, “The English treaty as signed’, although it bore little resemblance to the wording and sentence-by-sentence content of Te Tiriti o Waitangi.
It was merely one of James Stuart Freeman’s 7 Formal Royal Style memorial documents, earmarked solely for overseas dIspatch to dignitaries in foreign governments.
So why, leading up to 1975, did he so desperately want only one particular English version of the Treaty brought in to sit alongside the only internationally accepted Tiriti text, spanning the previous 135-years?
The answer is simple: So that he and his supporters could wreak havoc with the treaty wording, destroy its meaning and strip away its protections, thus leaving New Zealand and its rich assets open to plunder!
One can easily surmise that Matiu Rata and the Maori Council were assisted by switched-on internationalists or corporate factions in this 1970s sinister, resource-grabbing incentive. (Read UN)
How Maori Activists & Their Lawyers Reinvented New Zealand’s
Treaty of Waitangi by Martin Doutre
http://www.celticnz.co.nz/TreatyDocumentary/TreatyDocumentaryPart1.html
MATIU RATA BECOMES MINISTER OF MAORI AFFAIRS IN 1972.
By 1974, Minister of Maori Affairs, Matu Rata had managed to have his Treaty of Waitangi Bill accepted for reading by Parliament and it received royal assent into law in 1975. As stated, Rata was fixated on having an English-language version of the treaty introduced to sit alongside the Maori-language treaty (Te Tiriti o Waitangi) and be co-equal to it … a seemingly very strange request from a Maori leader as, up till that time, Te Tiriti text constituted the solitary wording under New Zealand and international law.
Rata and his cohorts forced acceptance of wording from a defunct and illegitimate Formal Royal Style document in English, concocted after the treaty presentation in 1840 solely for overseas despatch to foreign governments as a pretentious, memorial document … heralding the treaty between Britain and New Zealand to the international community.
As stated, what Rata was morally obliged to use, if he truly and genuinely intended to show what the Maori text said in English, was the 1869 back-translation, formally commissioned by the New Zealand government and officially issued by the Native Department, which absolutely mirrored, line-by-line, the content, meaning and intent of Te Tiriti o Waitangi.
The very cunning Matiu Rata, however, had a particular tribalist agenda in mind in elevating this illegitimate English wording to a status co-equal, under NZ legislation, to Te Tiriti o Waitangi Maori text.
Martin Doutre – Treaty of Waitangi
In Matiu Rata’s hard push to introduce an English language version into our legislation, to sit alongside Te Tiriti o Waitangi and be co-equal to it, he wanted this text from a defunct/illegitimate Formal Royal Style James Freeman version because there is no clear mention of the English or settlers rights.
ARTICLE THE SECOND
Her Majesty the Queen of England confirms and guarantees to the Chiefs and Tribes of New Zealand and to the respective families and individuals thereof the full exclusive and undisturbed possession of their Lands and Estates Forests Fisheries and other properties which they may collectively or individually possess so long as it is their wish and desire to retain the same in their possession.
He absolutely needed that text to supplant and replace the second article text of Te Tiriti o Waitangi as well as the text found in the official back-translation of Te Tiriti o Waitangi commissioned by the NZ Government, in 1869 by Mr T E Young, Native Department.
The Second
The Queen of England arranges and agrees to give to the Chiefs, the Hapus and all the people of New Zealand, the full chieftainship of their lands, their settlements and their property.
By Martin Doutre – Treaty of Waitangi
“The character assassination begins”
When all else fails in an open debate that is not going your way or the way you intended it to, simply attack the character of the person or persons speaking in opposition.
This is a sure sign that panic is setting in amongst the lunatic fringe who insist on having their rights recognised but not the rights of those that oppose them.
The purpose of healthy debate is to formulate a case for and against a particular subject, be that the Treaty of Waitangi or democracy and freedom of speech for example. The rules of these civilised debates apply to both sides and in order for an effective outcome to be yielded from the discussion these rules must be upheld.
What we have in New Zealand at this present point in time is quite simply a one sided argument where the rules are ignored.in favour of those who perceive they are oppressed. The proof of this decent into chaos is provided by all of the 120 sworn representatives of the people of New Zealand, simply sitting on their hands as chaos breaks out amongst the ranks.
What we are now left with is a political landscape where it is a crime to be a white biological male or female and to simply recognise that fact. To be white, biologically male and heterosexual is now a guarantee of instantly being categorised as a racist homophobic wife beater, according to the co leader of the Green Party. Now the Prime minister instantly springs to her defence because she was allegedly struck by a motorcycle driven by one of Brian Tamaki’s mob no doubt, who I would also surmise or venture a guess if that is indeed permitted, that this alleged motorcyclist was anything but a white male.
Now perhaps the recent violent protest by the supposedly peaceful LGBTQ community will attest to the thin skinned nature of people who are simply too afraid to hear or listen to an alternative view point on such topics as Womens rights !
The immigration minister revealed his true intent and colours by casting aspersions on the character of an invited speaker, he labelled as being vile and capable of inciting violence, yet the complete opposite eventuated.
There is a clear divide within New Zealand which has been very carefully orchestrated by the most evil politician to ever grace the halls of Parliament. The infamous Jacinda Ardern who simply left the scene of the crime and made good her pre meditated escape.
Where are you now Jacinda and why are you so silent ?
There is no greater or more effective catalyst for civil unrest and violence than a cost of living crisis coupled with a total lack of leadership at this pivotal time in the nations history. When the excrement hits the fan and it most certainly will, all of the 120 politicians will realise there will be no place to hide.
I wonder if Marama Davidson has considered what type of people are fighting for their very lives and freedom in the worn torn country of Ukraine which was invaded by Russia.
You guessed it Marama white Europeans – both male and female biologically so, and proud of it. Now let’s look at where the LGBTQ community sits in this conflict shall we – you guessed it again Marama, they all escaped persecution and flooded across the border into the safe zones away from the conflict.
But what will happen when the war is finally won and 100’s of thousands have lost heir lives Marama ?
You guessed it – the allegedly persecuted lunatic fringe will once again flood across the border and inhabit the safe zone created by others and they will once again demand to be heard and recognised.
It’s time to hand out cement pills and harden up or perish in a cesspool of mediocrity.