Soon after it was established in 1975, the Waitangi Tribunal was hijacked by Maori radicals.
It’s now 2022 and nothing has changed. Only the radicals are even more radical than they were in 1975.
The Tribunal has become a complete farce, a massive agency for conning Kiwis out of billions of dollars, all to fill the pockets of elite Maori.
It’s a place Maori can write cheques out to Maori with almost zero accountability.
Yesterday I asked you to read a newspaper article about how the Waitangi Tribunal was recommending that Northland be given to Maori.
You can read the newspaper report HERE
In todays blog, Dr Bruce Moon pulls the covers off the Tribunal’s recommendation.
You are read his views HERE
Stupid and stupider!
This will all stop soon and it will all go the other way.
Julian, I wish you would remove your comment that the Treaty is only made up of 3 parts. It has 5 parts,
Part 1. The Preamble, as in any agreement is extremely important as it explains the reason for the Treaty, what it was to do and who it referred to. Withou it, the articles mean nothing.
Part 2, 3, and 4. The Article explained how the Preamble would be implimented.
Part 5. The Consent showed the chiefs understood the Preamble and the 3 Articles and agreed to then all.
This is what the chiefs sighed in 1840 and must be published as the Treaty at all times if we are to understand what Maori actually agreed. To give up their governments and in return they would become British Subjects with the same rights as the people of England under one flag and one law. “He iwi tahi tatou – We are now one people'”. No more, no less!
The Tribual is completely out of control and must be abolished ASAP.
I agree with comment.
I totally agree. There is no way it can be misunderstood if you mention the ‘whole’ Treaty, not just three parts.
Given there the tribunal’s report runs to over 500 pages, I can understand if Bruce Moon has not read it all especially given it is Christmas. I think his summary that “the Tribunal just makes up stuff as a it goes along. It’s interpretation of the Treaty is just pure fantasy. It’s a scam” is his initial reactions. I hope there is a follow up analysis as to why he comes to those conclusions.
Even given the length of the report, it makes for interesting reading and covers the actions, thoughts and reasoning of the participants of the treaty signatories at the time.
The Treaty only consists of 3 main parts – the rest is window dressing.
When people start getting bogged down on technicalities, that’s when the rot sets in. It’s a simple document, misrepresented on so many levels by so many supposedly intelligent people.
Stick with the facts and stop being side tracked by all the superfluous crap. There is a battle to be fought and won, so do not become so easily distracted by preambles and stay the course. Put your energy where it is actually required, do not under any circumstances start debating technicalities, but instead galvanise as a group and take these traitors out now before it’s too late. The future of New Zealand is at stake and you are all being divided and will inevitably be conquered, unless you band together as one unit, not a divided rabble.
Who amongst you will actually turn up when you are called upon to stand and fight ? Be honest with yourself then join with Julian in August next year at the Auckland domain, to show your true character or forever be silent.
As I have said on Kiwiblog the other day, the three articles are so easy to comprehend a highschool kid would understand.
How all of the bending and twisting can be extracted from three articles I don’t get.
The Maori Elite are Gold diggers.
Orm the Viking. The reason why it is so esy to twist. Very difficult to twist the Treaty if it is taken as a whole as it was signed.
This sould also answer your question Steve.
In 1975 the Government enacted the Treaty of Waitangi Act that created the Waitangi Tribunal to hear claims that may occur after 1975. The Act was amended in 1985 to allow claims to date back to 1840, in most of cases these had already been “full and finally settled” or “rejected”.
Non Maori cannot lodge a claim, participate or appeal a recommendation by the Tribunal to Government, which in most cases the select Committee misleads Parliament and Parliament accepts the Bill without further investigation.
A past Chairman of the Tribunal, Chief Judge Eddie Durie admitted in the NZ Herald (17/11/1999) that researches fabricate and modify evidence, omit evidence not helpful to their claim and in some cases, were not paid unless they change their research to support the claim.
Some claims that were investigated by the Court in the 30’s/40’s, such as the Te Roroa claim that was rejected by Chief Judge Shepard and Parliament have been recommended and settled without one document of evidence.
The Minister of Justice Doug Graham acknowledged this when he signed the Deed of Sale, stating the Te Roroa claim was only an “alleged” claim, but ended up costing the taxpayer in excess of $30 million.
In fact Maori today with their reheard claims have accumulated in excess of $40 Billion thanks to weak Governments and “gullible” taxpayers.
Queen Victoria did not have the power or authority to give Maori any special rights in the Tiriti o Waitangi not already enjoyed by the people of England under English Law.
(Ref – ONZF)
The Apartheid Waitangi Tribunal must be abolished ASAP.
Phew, well done Julian for 365 x 7 blog articles!
The Waitangi Tribunal is now so far past its sell by date that it stinks to high heaven.
Thank you for your great encouragement too. It’s been really appreciated.
The ONZF would also like to thank Julian for allowing the Royal Charter to be put in front of the public.
Over 500 Maori chiefs agreed by the Tiriti o Waitangi in 1840 to give up their governments and in return; became British Subjects with the same rights as the people of England. The Treaty had achieved it purpose and was filed away.
Queen Victoria then issued a Royal Charter/Letters Patent on 16 November 1840, that made New Zealand into a British Colony on 3 May 1841 under one flag and one law, irrespective of race colour and creed.
There is no other document that comes anywhere near to a true Founding Document and first Constitution than Queen Victoria’s 1840 Royal Charter/Letters Patent.
As a ex South African I know firsthand what hapens in a devided nation. It is a dangerous path that will lead to major conflict. New Zealand is made up of a diverse community that would best be united as a Republic with a Constution that unites us all.
If I sign a contract and later on I am taken to court for breaching that contract, does the judge base his or her ruling on hypothetical guesswork as to what I might have thought I was signing at the time? Or is the ruling based on the text of the contract and the laws that pertain to it?
If a sane government is elected in 2023, they will hopefully enact legislation to end this long con by opportunistic and self-serving special interest groups who are shamelessly extorting billions from this country.